Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 17;5(11):e1582.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001582. eCollection 2017 Nov.

Craniofacial Reconstruction by a Cost-Efficient Template-Based Process Using 3D Printing

Affiliations

Craniofacial Reconstruction by a Cost-Efficient Template-Based Process Using 3D Printing

Bilal Msallem et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Craniofacial defects often result in aesthetic and functional deficits, which affect the patient's psyche and wellbeing. Patient-specific implants remain the optimal solution, but their use is limited or impractical due to their high costs. This article describes a fast and cost-efficient workflow of in-house manufactured patient-specific implants for craniofacial reconstruction and cranioplasty. As a proof of concept, we present a case of reconstruction of a craniofacial defect with involvement of the supraorbital rim. The following hybrid manufacturing process combines additive manufacturing with silicone molding and an intraoperative, manual fabrication process. A computer-aided design template is 3D printed from thermoplastics by a fused deposition modeling 3D printer and then silicone molded manually. After sterilization of the patient-specific mold, it is used intraoperatively to produce an implant from polymethylmethacrylate. Due to the combination of these 2 straightforward processes, the procedure can be kept very simple, and no advanced equipment is needed, resulting in minimal financial expenses. The whole fabrication of the mold is performed within approximately 2 hours depending on the template's size and volume. This reliable technique is easy to adopt and suitable for every health facility, especially those with limited financial resources in less privileged countries, enabling many more patients to profit from patient-specific treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Model of the forehead (white) and implant template (black).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Silicone mold and implant template.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Compression molding technique.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Patient-specific implant made from PALACOS R+G.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Preoperative planning (A), implant design (B), compression molding technique (C), intraoperative result (D).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Preoperatively planned, patient-specific implant (left side) and manually shaped implant (right side).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asimacopoulos TJ, Papadakis N, Mark VH. A new method of cranioplasty. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1977;47:790–792.. - PubMed
    1. Fathi AR, Marbacher S, Lukes A. Cost-effective patient-specific intraoperative molded cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:777–781.. - PubMed
    1. Sorour M, Caton WL, 3rd, Couldwell WT. Technique for methyl methacrylate cranioplasty to optimize cosmetic outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156:207–209.. - PubMed
    1. Stieglitz LH, Gerber N, Schmid T, et al. Intraoperative fabrication of patient-specific moulded implants for skull reconstruction: single-centre experience of 28 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156:793–803.. - PubMed
    1. Peltola MJ, Vallittu PK, Vuorinen V, et al. Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:623–628.. - PMC - PubMed