Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):237-244.
doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_87_17.

Implant Survival between Endo-osseous Dental Implants in Immediate Loading, Delayed Loading, and Basal Immediate Loading Dental Implants a 3-Year Follow-up

Ritesh Garg  1 , Neha Mishra  2 , Mohan Alexander  3 , Sunil Kumar Gupta  4
Affiliations

Implant Survival between Endo-osseous Dental Implants in Immediate Loading, Delayed Loading, and Basal Immediate Loading Dental Implants a 3-Year Follow-up

Ritesh Garg et al. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: With introduction of the term "ossteointegration of dental implant" by Branemark, advancement in implantology from 1957 to 2017 has come a long way with modification in implant type and in loading time. This study aims to evaluate the survival of endo-osseous immediate loading (IL) implant and basal IL implants in atrophic jaws with objective to compare implant survival in atrophic jaws for full mouth rehabilitation between endo-osseous IL versus endo-osseous delayed loading (DL) versus basal IL during 3-year follow-up.

Materials and methods: Fifty-two (34 endo-osseous and 18 basal) implants were placed in 4 patients requiring full mouth rehabilitation in atrophic jaws. Case 1: Endo-osseous DL implants in upper and lower arch, Case 2: Endo-osseous IL implants in upper and lower arch, Case 3: Basal IL implant in upper and lower arch, and Case 4: Endo-osseous DL in upper arch and basal IL implant in the lower arch. Intraoperative evaluation was done on the basis of pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), operative time, and initial primary implant stability. Postoperative evaluation was done on pain (VAS), infection, radiographically successful implant (orthopantomogram), and patient satisfaction (Grade 0-10).

Results: All cases showed satisfactory results but more amount of intra- and post-operative pain was felt with immediate basal implants.

Conclusion: We believe that clinicians should comply with patient requests, and for this reason, we agree with some authors to use minimally invasive techniques and to avoid when possible esthetic or functional problems associated with the use of removable prosthesis after teeth extractions.

Keywords: Atrophic jaws; basal dental implants; full mouth rehabilitation; immediate loading dental implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case 1 preoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case 1 postoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case 1 clinical picture - Intraoral, extraoral and occlusion
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case 2 preoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 5
Figure 5
Case 2 postoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 6
Figure 6
Case 2 Intraoral picture
Figure 7
Figure 7
Case 3 preoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 8
Figure 8
Case 3 postoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 9
Figure 9
Case 3 clinical and orthopantomogram
Figure 10
Figure 10
Case 4 preoperative orthopantomogram
Figure 11
Figure 11
Case 4 postoperative-orthopantomogram
Figure 12
Figure 12
Case 4 Intraoral clinical - Pre and postoperative
Graph 1
Graph 1
Graph showing pain on VAS scale & operative time (Intraoperative)
Graph 2
Graph 2
Pain as measured by VAS by time in the study population
Graph 3
Graph 3
Postoperative patient satisfaction with time
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347–59. - PubMed
    1. Sunil M, Mohan Reddy BM, Sridhar Reddy T, Raja Reddy N. Full mouth rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prosthesis: A case report. J Dr. NTR Univ Health Sci. 2013;2:292–5.
    1. Villa R, Rangert B. Immediate and early function of implants placed in extraction sockets of maxillary infected teeth: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:S96–108. - PubMed
    1. Qamheya AH, Yeniyol S, Arısan V. Full mouth oral rehabilitation by maxillary implant supported hybrid denture employing a fiber reinforced material instead of conventional PMMA. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:841745. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scortecci G, Misch CE, Benner KU. Implants and Restorative Dentistry. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 2001. pp. 79–85.