Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):1662-1672.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.14223. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Spirituality and religiosity of non-directed (altruistic) living kidney donors

Ariella Maghen  1 , Grecia B Vargas  1 , Sarah E Connor  1 , Sima Nassiri  1 , Elisabeth M Hicks  2 , Lorna Kwan  1 , Amy D Waterman  3   4 , Sally L Maliski  5 , Jeffrey L Veale  1
Affiliations

Spirituality and religiosity of non-directed (altruistic) living kidney donors

Ariella Maghen et al. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To describe the spirituality and religiosity of 30 non-directed (altruistic) living kidney donors in the USA and explore how they may have affected their motivations to donate and donation process experiences.

Background: The rise in non-directed donors and their ability to initiate kidney chains offer a novel approach to help alleviate the overextended kidney transplant wait list in the USA. However, little is known about the non-directed donors' motivations, characteristics and experiences.

Design: We conducted a qualitative-dominant study and used a grounded theory approach to analyse data.

Methods: Thirty participants completed in-depth interviews between April 2013-April 2015. Three analysts independently read and coded interview transcripts. Grounded theory techniques were used to develop descriptive categories and identify topics related to the non-directed donors donation experience.

Results: Sixteen of the 30 non-directed donorss discussed the topic of spirituality and religiosity when describing their donation experiences, regardless of whether they were actively practising a religion at the time of donation. Specifically, three themes were identified within spirituality and religiosity: motivation to donate, support in the process, and justification of their donation decisions postdonation.

Conclusions: Findings from this study are the first to describe how spirituality and religiosity influenced the experiences of U.S. non-directed donorss and may help improve non-directed donors educational resources for future spiritual or religious non-directed donors, and the overall non-directed donors donation experience in efforts to increase the living donor pool.

Relevance to clinical practice: Spirituality and religiosity are often overlooked yet potentially influential factors in Western medicine, as demonstrated through the experiences of Jehovah's Witnesses and their religious restrictions while undergoing surgery and the beliefs of Christian Scientists against taking medications and receiving medical procedures. Understanding needs of non-directed donors specifically with spirituality and religiosity can better position kidney transplant centres and teams to improve predonation screening of non-directed donor candidates and provide support services during the donation process.

Keywords: beliefs; decision-making; grounded theory; health services research; qualitative study; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article

References

    1. Arriola KR, Perryman JP, Doldren MA, Warren CM, & Robinson DH (2007). Understand the role of clergy in African American organ and tissue donation decision-making. Ethnicity & Health, 12(5), 465–482. doi:10.1080/13557850701616896 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charmaz K (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications. - PubMed
    1. Coad L, Carter N, & Ling J (2013). Attitudes of young adults from the United Kingdom towards organ donation and transplantation. Transplantation Research, 2(1), 9. doi:10.1186/2047-1440-2-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creswell JW (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
    1. DeHaven M, Hunter I, Wilder L, Walton J, & Berry J (2004). Health programs in faith-based organizations: Are they effective? American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 1030–1036. doi:10.2105/ajph.94.6.1030 - DOI - PMC - PubMed