Vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China
- PMID: 29268652
- DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1416351
Vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to qualify relevant factors for vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert in a Chinese tertiary maternity hospital.
Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital. A total of 1656 pregnancies that underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone insert between January and August 2016 were finally included in this study. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression modeling.
Results: Of 1656 women with PGE2-induced labor at term, 396 (23.91%) gave birth by cesarean section, 1260 (76.09%) had a vaginal delivery among which 921 (55.61%) delivered vaginally within 24 h. Multivariable regression analysis showed that maternal age (p < .001, OR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.85-0.93), parity (multiparous versus nulliparous, p < .001, OR = 8.74, 95%CI 4.36-17.50), baseline fetal heart rate (p = .009, OR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.96-0.99), and birth weight (p < .001, OR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.28-0.51) were significantly correlated with vaginal delivery. Moreover, body mass index (p < .001, OR = 1.11, 95%CI 1.05-1.19), parity (multiparous versus nulliparous, p < .001, OR = 6.57, 95%CI 2.37-18.23), baseline fetal heart rate (p = .004, OR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.94-0.99), and birth weight (p < .001, OR = 0.34, 95%CI 0.21-0.54) were independent predictors of vaginal delivery within 24-h.
Conclusions: Our findings suggested a vaginal delivery rate of 76.09% when dinoprostone vaginal insert was used for labor induction, which was markedly higher than the overall annual vaginal delivery rate of 65.1% in China during 2014. Maternal age, parity, baseline fetal heart rate, and birth weight were significant factors for vaginal delivery. This study enables us to better understand the efficiency of dinoprostone and the potential predictors of vaginal delivery in dinoprostone-induced labor, which may be helpful to guide the clinical use of dinoprostone and therefore provide better service clinically.
Keywords: Dinoprostone vaginal (PGE2) insert; induction of labor; vaginal delivery.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of the induction to delivery time interval in vaginal dinoprostone-induced labor: a retrospective study in a Chinese tertiary maternity hospital.J Int Med Res. 2019 Jun;47(6):2647-2654. doi: 10.1177/0300060519845780. Epub 2019 May 17. J Int Med Res. 2019. PMID: 31096809 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Dec;27(18):1874-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.883375. Epub 2014 Feb 4. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014. PMID: 24417462
-
Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;59(5):723-727. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.017. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32917325
-
Inpatient vaginal dinoprostone vs outpatient balloon catheters for cervical ripening in induction of labor: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1041-1055. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15092. Epub 2025 Mar 25. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025. PMID: 40134109 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4929-8. Epub 2018 Oct 12. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 30315411 Review.
Cited by
-
A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study.Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;193(3):1343-1350. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03568-3. Epub 2023 Nov 10. Ir J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 37947994 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 19;11(12):3519. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123519. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743589 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04151-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34620120 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Pre-Induction Ultrasound Parameters and the Bishop Score to Determine Whether Labor Induction Is Successful.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 12;60(7):1127. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071127. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39064556 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 9;9:976983. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.976983. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36160157 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical