Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 11:5:9-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2017.11.002. eCollection 2018 Jun.

A community-based One Health education program for disease risk mitigation at the human-animal interface

Affiliations

A community-based One Health education program for disease risk mitigation at the human-animal interface

Amanda M Berrian et al. One Health. .

Abstract

The interface between humans, domestic animals, and wildlife has been implicated in the emergence of infectious diseases and the persistence of endemic human and animal diseases. For individuals who reside at this interface, particularly those in low-resource settings, the development of disease risk assessment and mitigation skills must be prioritized. Using a community engagement-One Health approach, we implemented a training program aimed at advancing these skills among agro-pastoralists living adjacent to conservation areas in South Africa. The program included professional development of local facilitators who then conducted workshops with community members. Workshops used a series of experiential, inquiry-based activities to teach participants the concepts of pathogen transmission and disease risk assessment and mitigation. The program was implemented over four weeks with 10 facilitators and 78 workshop participants. We conducted a within-subjects experimental study using a mixed methods design to evaluate the program in terms of facilitator and participant One Health knowledge and practices. Quantitative data included pre/post written assessments; qualitative data included focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and pre/post photographs. Mean post-test scores of facilitators increased by 17% (p = 0.0078). For workshop participants, improvements in knowledge were more likely for females than males (OR = 7.315, 95% CI = 2.258-23.705, p = 0.0009) and participants with a higher versus lower education level, albeit borderline non-significant (OR = 4.781, 95% CI = 0.942-24.264, p = 0.0590). Qualitative analysis revealed the implementation of risk mitigation strategies by 98% (60/61) of workshop participants during the three-month follow-up and included improved personal and domestic hygiene practices and enhanced animal housing. Although further evaluation is recommended, this program may be appropriate for consideration as a scalable approach by which to mitigate human and animal infectious disease risk in high-risk/low-resource communities.

Keywords: CE, Community Engagement; Community engagement; EM, Environmental Monitor; Experiential learning; FGD, Focus Group Discussion; Health promotion; Infectious disease; MCP, Mnisi Community Programme; OH, One Health; OHTL, One Health Training and Leadership; PD, Professional Development; Program evaluation; Risk assessment; TFCA, Transfrontier Conservation Area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change in One Health Training and Leadership participant (n = 69) knowledge by gender and education level. †12 questions (multiple choice, true/false).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a–d. Photographs depicting high-risk practices or interfaces before and after risk mitigation. (a) Bucket with water is made available in the toilet area for hand-washing, (b) Standing water is removed near the house to reduce mosquitoes, (c) A water tap is covered to reduce contamination from animals, (d) Building materials and debris are removed from around the house to reduce risk of vectors and vermin.

References

    1. Kock R. What is the infamous “wildlife/livestock interface?” A review of current knowledge for the African continent. In: Osofsky S.A., editor. Conservation and Development Interventions at the Wildlife/Livestock Interface. Implications for Wildlife, Livestock, and Human Health. International Union for Conservation of Nature; Cambridge, UK: 2005. pp. 1–13.
    1. Mazet J.A.K., Clifford D.L., Coppolillo P.B., Deolalikar A.B., Erickson J.D., Kazwala R.R. A “one health” approach to address emerging zoonoses: the HALI project in Tanzania. PLoS Med. 2009;6(12):1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castillo-Chavez C., Curtiss R., Daszak P., Levin S.A., Patterson-Lomba O., Perrings C. Beyond ebola: lessons to mitigate future pandemics. Lancet Glob. Health. 2015;3(7):354–355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gebreyes W.A., Dupouy-Camet J., Newport M.J., Oliveira C.J.B., Schlesinger L.S., Saif Y.M. The global one health paradigm: challenges and opportunities for tackling infectious diseases at the human, animal, and environment interface in low-resource settings. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014;8(11):1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bogich T.L., Chunara R., Scales D., Chan E., Pinheiro L.C., Chmura A.A. Preventing pandemics via international development: a systems approach. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):1–4. - PMC - PubMed