Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 21;20(3):778-788.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx143.

Bioinformatics for precision oncology

Affiliations
Review

Bioinformatics for precision oncology

Jochen Singer et al. Brief Bioinform. .

Abstract

Molecular profiling of tumor biopsies plays an increasingly important role not only in cancer research, but also in the clinical management of cancer patients. Multi-omics approaches hold the promise of improving diagnostics, prognostics and personalized treatment. To deliver on this promise of precision oncology, appropriate bioinformatics methods for managing, integrating and analyzing large and complex data are necessary. Here, we discuss the specific requirements of bioinformatics methods and software that arise in the setting of clinical oncology, owing to a stricter regulatory environment and the need for rapid, highly reproducible and robust procedures. We describe the workflow of a molecular tumor board and the specific bioinformatics support that it requires, from the primary analysis of raw molecular profiling data to the automatic generation of a clinical report and its delivery to decision-making clinical oncologists. Such workflows have to various degrees been implemented in many clinical trials, as well as in molecular tumor boards at specialized cancer centers and university hospitals worldwide. We review these and more recent efforts to include other high-dimensional multi-omics patient profiles into the tumor board, as well as the state of clinical decision support software to translate molecular findings into treatment recommendations.

Keywords: cancer; clinical decision support; data analysis pipeline; molecular tumor board; mutation calling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic overview of the workflow of a MTB. Tumor biopsies are obtained from consenting patients, and DNA is extracted and sequenced. Variants are called and then annotated and prioritized for potential functional or clinical relevance before being reported to a tumor board, where an interdisciplinary team decides about treatment options.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic overview of analysis steps for DNA variant calling (blue, top) and RNA expression analysis (red, bottom).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of concise report summary from an MTBZ report, including mutational burden, HLA-I type of the patient, mutational state of cancer-type-specific set of important genes, grouped according to level of approval.

References

    1. Kotecha RS, Kees UR, Cole CH, et al.Rare childhood cancers–an increasing entity requiring the need for global consensus and collaboration. Cancer Med 2015;4(6):819–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meric-Bernstam F, Brusco L, Shaw K, et al.Feasibility of large-scale genomic testing to facilitate enrollment onto genomically matched clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(25):2753–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burrell RA, McGranahan N, Bartek J, et al.The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Nature 2013;501(7467):338–45. - PubMed
    1. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al.Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366(10):883–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oberg JA, Glade Bender JL, Sulis ML, et al.Implementation of next generation sequencing into pediatric hematology-oncology practice: moving beyond actionable alterations. Genome Med 2016;8:133. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types