Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 1;25(3):360-368.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx145.

Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records

Christopher A Harle  1 , Elizabeth H Golembiewski  1 , Kiarash P Rahmanian  2 , Janice L Krieger  3 , Dorothy Hagmajer  3 , Arch G Mainous  2   4 , Ray E Moseley  2
Affiliations

Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records

Christopher A Harle et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient perceptions of using an interactive electronic consent (e-consent) application when deciding whether or not to grant broad consent for research use of their identifiable electronic health record (EHR) information.

Materials and methods: For this qualitative study, we conducted a series of 42 think-aloud interviews with 32 adults. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach.

Results: We identified themes related to patient preferences, reservations, and mixed attitudes toward consenting electronically; low- and high-information-seeking behavior; and an emphasis on reassuring information, such as data protections and prohibitions against sharing data with pharmaceutical companies. Participants expressed interest in the types of information contained in their EHRs, safeguards protecting EHR data, and specifics on studies that might use their EHR data.

Discussion: This study supports the potential value of interactive e-consent applications that allow patients to customize their consent experience. This study also highlights that some people have concerns about e-consent platforms and desire more detailed information about administrative processes and safeguards that protect EHR data used in research.

Conclusion: This study contributes new insights on how e-consent applications could be designed to ensure that patients' information needs are met when seeking consent for research use of health record information. Also, this study offers a potential electronic approach to meeting the new Common Rule requirement that consent documents contain a "concise and focused" presentation of key information followed by more details.

Keywords: Common Rule; broad consent; e-consent; electronic health record; information systems design; research informatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of clickable hyperlink to obtain more information on the concept of “health record information”.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
E-consent interface for patients to provide their name and signature.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lowes LP, Noritz GH, Newmeyer A, Embi PJ, Yin H, Smoyer WE. ‘Learn From Every Patient’: Implementation and early results of a learning health system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;592:183–91. - PubMed
    1. Embi PJ, Payne PR. Evidence generating medicine: redefining the research-practice relationship to complete the evidence cycle. Med Care. 2013;51:S87–91. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, Lieu TA, Durham ML, et al.Developing a data infrastructure for a learning health system: the PORTAL network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;214:596–601. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernandez AF, Fleurence RL, Rothman RL. The ADAPTABLE trial and PCORnet: shining light on a new research paradigm. Ann Int Med. 2015;1638:635–36. - PubMed
    1. Ohno-Machado L, Alipanah N, Day M, et al.Comprehensive Inventory of Research Networks: Clinical Data Research Networks, Patient-Powered Research Networks, and Patient Registries. Washington, DC: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 2013.