Impact of quadripolar LV leads on heart failure hospitalization rates among patients implanted with CRT-D: data from the Israeli ICD Registry
- PMID: 29274032
- DOI: 10.1007/s10840-017-0305-z
Impact of quadripolar LV leads on heart failure hospitalization rates among patients implanted with CRT-D: data from the Israeli ICD Registry
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF); however, a third of patients are non-responders. The development of quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead was shown, mainly in single manufactures' registry, to improve LV remodeling and overall mortality. However, limited reports exist on the impact of quadripolar LV leads on HF hospitalization rates in real-life cohorts. We evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with quadripolar LV leads in a large nation-wide registry including all patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D).
Methods: Between July 2010 and October 2016, 2913 consecutive patients were implanted with a CRT-D and all were prospectively enrolled in the Israeli ICD Registry. Quadripolar LV leads were implanted in 973 (33.4%) patients during this period, and their clinical outcomes were compared to CRT-D recipients implanted with a bipolar LV lead. Primary endpoint was HF hospitalization rate.
Results: Quadripolar leads were implanted more in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and for primary prevention indication and less in post-infarction patients and for secondary prevention of sudden death. Longer QRS duration was observed with quadripolar leads (147 ± 23 vs 143 ± 25; p < 0.001). Outcome event rate for 100 patient years revealed no difference in HF hospitalization rates between bipolar and quadripolar LV leads. Quadripolar lead implant led to lower cardiac mortality, with no influence on overall mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in study endpoints between bipolar and quadripolar LV leads.
Conclusion: In a large real-life registry, implantation of quadripolar LV leads in patients with CRT-D did not influence HF hospitalization rates.
Keywords: CRT-D; Heart failure; Hospitalization; Mortality; Quadripolar LV leads.
Similar articles
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 17;6(10):e007026. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007026. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 29042422 Free PMC article.
-
Reduced long-term overall mortality in heart failure patients with prolonged QRS treated with CRT combined with ICD vs. heart failure patients with narrow QRS treated with ICD only.Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1374-82. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv347. Epub 2015 Nov 26. Europace. 2016. PMID: 26612878
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy in a Large, Multicenter UK Registry.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Feb;3(2):107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.04.009. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 28280785 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac resynchronization is pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovasc Res. 2018 Sep 1;114(11):1435-1444. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy182. Cardiovasc Res. 2018. PMID: 30010807
-
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure and QRS interval ≤130 ms: insights from a meta-analysis.Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):267-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu214. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Europace. 2015. PMID: 25164431 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):927-934. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9737-5. Heart Fail Rev. 2018. PMID: 30209643
-
Contributions of Israel to the field of clinical cardiac electrophysiology and implantable devices.Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Feb 21;5(2):67-84. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.11.006. eCollection 2024 Feb. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024. PMID: 38545322 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018 Oct;15(5):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s11897-018-0407-7. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018. PMID: 30097910 Review.
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with multipoint pacing in a patient with cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction.Clin Case Rep. 2019 May 16;7(6):1242-1248. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2194. eCollection 2019 Jun. Clin Case Rep. 2019. PMID: 31183103 Free PMC article.
-
Multipoint left ventricular pacing as an addition to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a bridge to the holy grail?Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):429-440. eCollection 2021. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 34548940 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous