Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 2:266:301-309.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 17.

Antimicrobial residues and resistance against critically important antimicrobials in non-typhoidal Salmonella from meat sold at wet markets and supermarkets in Vietnam

Affiliations

Antimicrobial residues and resistance against critically important antimicrobials in non-typhoidal Salmonella from meat sold at wet markets and supermarkets in Vietnam

Nguyen Thi Nhung et al. Int J Food Microbiol. .

Abstract

Excessive antimicrobial usage and deficiencies in hygiene in meat production systems may result in undesirable human health hazards, such as the presence of antimicrobial drug residues and non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS), including antimicrobial resistant (AMR) NTS. Recently, Vietnam has witnessed the emergence of integrated intensive animal production systems, coexisting with more traditional, locally-sourced wet markets. To date no systematic studies have been carried out to compare health hazards in beef, pork and chicken in different production systems. We aimed to: (1) estimate the prevalence of antimicrobial residues in beef, pork and chicken meat; (2) investigate the prevalence and levels of NTS contamination; and (3) investigate serovar distribution and AMR against critically important antimicrobials by animal species and type of retail (wet market vs. supermarket) in Vietnam. Fresh pork, beef and chicken meat samples (N=357) sourced from wet markets and supermarkets in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Hanoi and Dong Thap were screened for antimicrobial residues by PremiTest, and were further investigated by Charm II. Samples from HCMC (N=113) were cultured using ISO 6579:2002/Amd 1:2007. NTS bacteria were quantified using a minimum probable number (MPN) technique. NTS isolates were assigned to serovar by Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST), and were investigated for their phenotypic susceptibility against 32 antimicrobials. A total of 26 (7.3%) samples tested positive by PremiTest (9.5% beef, 4.1% pork and 8.4% chicken meat). Sulfonamides, tetracyclines and macrolides were detected by Charm in 3.1%, 2.8% and 2.0% samples, respectively. Overall, meat samples from wet markets had a higher prevalence of residues than those from supermarkets (9.6% vs. 2.6%) (p=0.016). NTS were isolated from 68.4% samples from HCMC. Chicken samples from wet markets had by far the highest NTS counts (median 3.2 logMPN/g). NTS isolates displayed high levels of resistance against quinolones (52.2%) and β-lactams (49.6%), but low levels against 3rd generation cephalosporins (4.4%) and aminoglycosides (0.8%). The highest adjusted prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) corresponded to isolates from chicken meat and pork (OR 8.3 and 1.8, respectively) (baseline=beef). S. Kentucky was the most common serovar identified (11 from chicken, 1 from beef) and 91.7% isolates was MDR. 11/12 isolates corresponded to ST198, a worldwide-disseminated multi-resistant NTS clone. We recommend stepping up policy measures to promote responsible antimicrobial use in animal production, as well as awareness about withdrawal periods to limit the hazard of residues in animal products, and improving slaughtering/hygiene procedures to limit cross-contamination with NTS, particularly in poultry wet markets.

Keywords: Antimicrobial residues; Antimicrobial resistance; Livestock; Meat; Poultry; Salmonella.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
NTS counts (log MPN/g) in 21 meat samples from markets in HCMC. White and grey bars indicate samples collected from supermarkets and wet markets, respectively.

References

    1. Angkititrakul S., Chomvarin C., Chaita T., Kanistanon K., Waethewutajarn S. Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in salmonella isolated from pork, chicken meat and humans in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 2005;36:1510–1515. - PubMed
    1. Antunes P., Mourao J., Campos J., Peixe L. Salmonellosis: the role of poultry meat. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016;22:110–121. - PubMed
    1. Blodgett R. Most Probable Number Determination from Serial Dilutions. 2006. Bacteriological analytical manual online, appendix 2.
    1. Carrique-Mas J.J., Barnes S., McLaren I., Davies R. Comparison of three plating media for the isolation of Salmonella from poultry environmental samples in Great Britain using ISO 6579:2002 (Annex D) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009;107:1976–1983. - PubMed
    1. Carrique-Mas J., Trung N.V., Hoa N.T., Mai H.H., Thanh T.T., Campbell J., Wagenaar J., Hardon A., Hieu T.Q., Schultsz C. Antimicrobial usage in chicken production in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014;61(Suppl. 2):1–9. - PubMed

Substances