Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;42(8):1795-1802.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3732-7. Epub 2017 Dec 23.

Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty

Affiliations

Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty

Keisuke Akiyama et al. Int Orthop. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The influence of physiologic femoral bowing on range of motion (ROM) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the morphology of the femur in patients who underwent THA, and to analyze the influence of femoral bowing on ROM due to implant impingement after THA.

Methods: The ROM was calculated from 100 hips in 90 patients who underwent THA using computed tomography data with a 3D dynamic analysis software. Lateral and anterior bowing angles of the femur were measured. A modular implant (Modulus system, Lima Corporate, Villanova di San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) was used for simulation. In all subjects, cup inclination, anteversion, and stem anteversion were set to 40°, 15°, and 30°, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the morphology of the femur and ROM.

Results: Lateral bowing of the femur was demonstrated to be significantly correlated with age (r = 0.361, p < 0.001) and female sex (r = 0.315, p = 0.001). Lateral bowing of the femur was significantly positively correlated with flexion and internal rotation (Int-R) with 90° flexion. Anterior bowing was significantly associated with decreasing flexion, decreasing Int-R with 90° flexion and increasing Int-R with 45° flexion and 15° adduction.

Conclusions: A ROM-optimized cup position cannot be calculated from femoral stem anteversion values alone; therefore, when surgeons position the cup in relation to the femoral stem anteversion, the influence of femoral bowing may also require consideration.

Keywords: Femoral bowing; Implant impingement; Range of motion; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Dec;(393):52-65 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Mar;75(2):228-32 - PubMed
    1. Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1615-22 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2403-13 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Jul-Aug;22(4):610-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources