Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;122(2):391-409.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0698-3. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards

Kelly Bergstrand  1 , Brian Mayer  2 , Babette Brumback  3 , Yi Zhang  4
Affiliations

Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards

Kelly Bergstrand et al. Soc Indic Res. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

This article contributes to the disaster literature by measuring and connecting two concepts that are highly related but whose relationship is rarely empirically evaluated: social vulnerability and community resilience. To do so, we measure community resilience and social vulnerability in counties across the United States and find a correlation between high levels of vulnerability and low levels of resilience, indicating that the most vulnerable counties also tend to be the least resilient. We also find regional differences in the distribution of community resilience and social vulnerability, with the West being particularly vulnerable while the Southeast is prone to low levels of resilience. By looking at both social vulnerability and community resilience, we are able to map communities' social risks for harm from threats as well as their capacities for recovering and adapting in the aftermath of hazards. This provides a more complete portrait of the communities that might need the most assistance in emergency planning and response, as well as whether such interventions will need to be tailored toward reducing damage or finding the path to recovery.

Keywords: Community resilience; Disasters; Hazard indicators; Social vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatterplot of SoVI and negative CRI scores
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Intra-group variance of SoVI and negative CRI scores
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Map of county-level SoVI percentiles
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Map of county-level negative CRI percentiles
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Map of the association between SoVI and negative CRI
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adger WN. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development. 1999;27:249–269.
    1. Alwang J, Siegel PB, Jorgensen SL. Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines. Washington, DC: World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No. 115; 2001.
    1. Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change. 2005;15:151–163.
    1. Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra. 2003;19:733–752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497. - DOI
    1. Coles E, Buckle P. Developing community resilience as a foundation for effective disaster recovery. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 2004;19:6–15.

LinkOut - more resources