Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Nov;57(11):5-10.
doi: 10.18087/cardio.2017.11.10048.

[Comparison of Direct Stenting Versus Stending After Pre-Dilation in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction]

[Article in Russian]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Comparison of Direct Stenting Versus Stending After Pre-Dilation in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction]

[Article in Russian]
V A Kuznetsov et al. Kardiologiia. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Aim: To study was to assess in-hospital outcomes of direct coronary stenting (DS) compared with stenting after predilation (PD) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Material and methods: Data were collected from all patients (n=1103) with STEMI subjected to primary PCI in Tyumen cardiology center from 2006 to 2014. The clinical and angiographic characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, as well as predictors of no-reflow phenomenon were analyzed. The composite of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis were defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results: Altogether 563 patients (51 %) underwent DS, and in 540 (49 %) stents were implanted after PD. Patients in DS group compared with those in PD group were younger (57.9±10.9 vs 60±11.5 years; p=0.001), less often had chronic kidney disease (5.2 vs 8.4 %; р=0.034), more often recieved prehospital thrombolysis (25 vs 11.9 %; p.

Keywords: direct stenting; myocardial infarction; primary percutaneous coronary interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources