Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 15;18(4):181-184.
doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0032.

Prevalence of group B Streptococcal colonization among pregnant women and neonates in a tertiary hospital in India

Sridhar Santhanam  1 , Ruby Jose  2 , Rani Diana Sahni  3 , Niranjan Thomas  1 , Manisha Madhai Beck  2
Affiliations

Prevalence of group B Streptococcal colonization among pregnant women and neonates in a tertiary hospital in India

Sridhar Santhanam et al. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic, and the colonization rates among newborn born to colonized mothers.

Material and methods: Women attending the antenatal clinic between 35-37 weeks were screened using rectal and lower vaginal swab. Swabs were initially plated on sheep blood agar and LIM broth. The LIM broth was subcultured after 24 hours onto blood agar and CHROMagar StrepB plates with all plates checked for growth at 24 and 48 hours. All babies born to mothers in the study had surface swabs taken to estimate the vertical transmission rate.

Results: Between September 2012 and March 2013, 305 consecutive mothers were screened. Of these, eight mothers were GBS positive in 5% blood agar (2.6%) and 23 mothers showed GBS positivity in enriched media (7.6%). Sixteen of 238 babies (6.7%) were colonized.

Conclusion: Though lower than rates from most countries, 7.6% of mothers attending an antenatal clinic in south India were colonized with GBS. Use of enrichment media markedly increased the detection rate. Approximately two-thirds of newborn born to colonized mothers were also colonized. There were no instances of invasive GBS disease, indirectly proving the efficacy of intrapartum prophylaxis in preventing neonatal GBS disease.

Keywords: India; Pregnancy; group B Streptococcus infection.; newborn.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by the authors.

References

    1. Campbell JR, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Ferrieri P, Zaleznik DF, Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal colonization and serotype-specific immunity in pregnant women at delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:498–503. - PubMed
    1. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: Revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010;59:1–32. - PubMed
    1. Mani V, Jadhav M, Sivadasan K, Thangavelu CP, Rachel M, Prabha J. Maternal and neonatal colonization with group B Streptococcus and neonatal outcome. Indian Pediatr. 1984;21:357–63. - PubMed
    1. Sharmila V, Joseph NM, Arun Babu T, Chaturvedula L, Sistla S. Genital tract group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women: a South Indian perspective. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5:592–5. - PubMed
    1. Kuruvilla KA, Thomas N, Jesudasan MV, Jana AK. Neonatal group B streptococcal bacteraemia in India: ten years’ experience. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88:1031–2. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources