Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May-Jun;20(3):152-156.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.218303.

Cytocompatibility of a self-adhesive gutta-percha root-filling material

Affiliations

Cytocompatibility of a self-adhesive gutta-percha root-filling material

Joyce Nascimento et al. J Conserv Dent. 2017 May-Jun.

Abstract

Context: A novel root-filling material based on the incorporation of ultrafine alkaline bioactive glass particles (bioactive gutta-percha, [BGP]) was developed to work without sealer.

Aim: In the present study, the objective was to verify the in vitro biological response to this material by assessing its cytocompatibility.

Materials and methods: Prototypes of BGP were compared to conventional gutta-percha (GP), dense polystyrene beads as a negative control and fragments of latex as a positive control. Extracts of each material were prepared according to ISO 10993-5:2009, and human osteoblast-like cells in primary culture were exposed to all extracts for 24 h. Cell viability was assayed sequentially for three different parameters: mitochondrial activity, membrane integrity, and cell density.

Statistical analysis used: Nonparametric analysis (using Kruskal-Wallis test combined with post hoc Dunn's test) was performed for comparison among groups, with significance established at 5%.

Results: BGP reduced mitochondrial activity to 62% of control, but presented no toxicity on membrane integrity and proliferation assays. BGP effect on metabolism was dose-dependent and reduced to acceptable levels with dilution.

Conclusion: The novel GP material presented slight dose-dependent effects on cell metabolism but did not affect cell survival.

Keywords: Biocompatibility testing; bioglass; gutta-percha.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multiparametric cytotoxicity assay. (a) XTT; (b) NR and (c) CVDE. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5), normalized as a percentage of the control (untreated) group. PS – Polystyrene: Negative control; Latex: Positive control; BGP: Bioglass gutta-percha; GP: Gutta-percha. An asterisk indicates significant difference from control group(P < 0.05)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Determination of dependence of dose on the XTT assay. Extracts were diluted on culture media in the indicated percentage before cell exposure. Results of XTT reduction presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 5), normalized as a percentage of the control (untreated) group. Latex: Positive control; BGP: Bioglass gutta-percha; GP: Gutta-percha

Similar articles

References

    1. Li GH, Niu LN, Zhang W, Olsen M, De-Deus G, Eid AA, et al. Ability of new obturation materials to improve the seal of the root canal system: A review. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1050–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015;41:72–8. - PubMed
    1. Shashidhar C, Shivanna V, Shivamurthy G, Shashidhar J. The comparison of microbial leakage in roots filled with resilon and gutta-percha: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:21–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tanomaru-Filho M, Bier CA, Tanomaru JM, Barros DB. Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of different gutta-percha cones and the TC system. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15:131–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyer KM, Kollmar F, Schirrmeister JF, Schneider F, Hellwig E. Analysis of shrinkage of different gutta-percha types using optical measurement methods. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2006;116:356–61. - PubMed