Comments on "Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis"
- PMID: 29281005
- PMCID: PMC5846706
- DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw232
Comments on "Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis"
Comment in
-
Response to "Comments on 'Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis'".Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Feb 17;38(2):NP31. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx233. Aesthet Surg J. 2018. PMID: 29280993 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis.Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Apr;36(4):390-401. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv260. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Aesthet Surg J. 2016. PMID: 26801234 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ilhan AE, Cengiz B, Caypinar Eser B. Double-blind comparison of ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy in terms of early postoperative edema and ecchymosis. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(4):390-401. - PubMed
-
- Farrokhyar F, Karanicolas PJ, Thoma A et al. . Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):409-416. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
