Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):897.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3929-6.

Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark

Elsebeth Lynge  1 , Martin Bak  2 , My von Euler-Chelpin  3 , Niels Kroman  4 , Anders Lernevall  5 , Nikolaj Borg Mogensen  6 , Walter Schwartz  7 , Adam Jan Wronecki  8 , Ilse Vejborg  9
Affiliations

Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark

Elsebeth Lynge et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: In Denmark, national roll-out of a population-based, screening mammography program took place in 2007-2010. We report on outcome of the first four biennial invitation rounds.

Methods: Data on screening outcome were retrieved from the 2015 and 2016 national screening quality reports. We calculated coverage by examination; participation after invitation; detection-, interval cancer- and false-positive rates; cancer characteristics; sensitivity and specificity, for Denmark and for the five regions.

Results: At the national level coverage by examination remained at 75-77%; lower in the Capital Region than in the rest of Denmrk. Detection rate was slightly below 1% at first screen, 0.6% at subsequent screens, and one region had some fluctuation over time. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constituted 13-14% of screen-detected cancers. In subsequent rounds, 80% of screen-detected invasive cancers were node negative and 40% ≤10 mm. False-positive rate was around 2%; higher for North Denmark Region than for the rest of Denmark. Three out of 10 breast cancers in screened women were diagnosed as interval cancers.

Conclusions: High coverage by examination and low interval cancer rate are required for screening to decrease breast cancer mortality. Two pioneer local screening programs starting in the 1990s were followed by a decrease in breast cancer mortality of 22-25%. Coverage by examination and interval cancer rate of the national program were on the favorable side of values from the pioneer programs. It appears that the implementation of a national screening program in Denmark has been successful, though regional variations need further evaluation to assure optimization of the program.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Ductal carcinoma in situ.; Mammography.; Screening..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Data for this study were downloaded from public data sources available in the format of tables. Use of such tables does not require ethical approval and/or participant consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coverage in screening mammography in Denmark 2008–2015 by invitation round and region. Percent and 95% confidence intervals. Notes: 1 South Denmark omitted in 1st round because only 70% of target population was invited. 2 Zealand omitted in 2nd round because the round was stopped before time to synchronize time periods across regions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Detection rate in screening mammography in Denmark 2008–2015 by region and invitation round. Percent and 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sensitivity versus 1-specificity in screening mammography in Denmark 2015 by region and invitation round
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Coverage by examination, interval cancers rate and false positive rate in the first four invitation rounds of the pilot screening programs in Copenhagen and Funen and in the Danish national program. Percent and 95% confidence interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Kejs AMT, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, Khan S, Leinonen MK, Ólafsdóttir E, Petersen T, Schmidt LKH, Trykker H, Storm HH. NORDCAN: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 7.3 (08.07.2016). Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Danish Cancer Society. Available from. [Accessed on 4 May 2017].
    1. Onland-Moret NC, Peeters PHM, van Gills CH, Clavel-Chapelon F, Key T, Tjønneland A, Trichopoulou A, Kaaks R, Manjer J, Panico S, Palli D, Teherd B, Stoikidao M, Bueno-deMesquita HB, Boeing H, Overvad K, Lenner P, Quirós JR, Chirlaque MD, Miller AB, Khaw KT, Riboli E. Age at menarche in relation to adult height. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:623–632. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi260. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nielsen NM, Harpsøe M, Simonsen J, Stenager E, Magyari M, Koch-Henriksen N, Baker JL, Hjalgrim H, Frisch M, Bager P. Age at menarch and risk of multiple sclerosis: a prespoctive cohort study based in the Danish national birth cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185:712–719. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danmarks Statistik. [Population development 2015]. København: Danmarks Statistik, 2016. (in Danish).
    1. Hoffmann K, de Gelder R, Hu Y, Bopp M, Vitrai J, Lahelma E, Menvielle G, Santana P, Regidor E, Ekholm O, Mackenbach JP, van Lenthe FJ. Trends in educational inequalities in obesity in 15 European countries between 1990 and 2010. Int J Behaviour Nutr. 2017;14:63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0517-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms