Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):136.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9.

Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center

Eric Lambaudie  1 , Alexandre de Nonneville  2 , Clément Brun  3 , Charlotte Laplane  4 , Lam N'Guyen Duong  3 , Jean-Marie Boher  5 , Camille Jauffret  4 , Guillaume Blache  4 , Sophie Knight  4 , Eric Cini  4 , Gilles Houvenaeghel  4 , Jean-Louis Blache  3
Affiliations
Observational Study

Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center

Eric Lambaudie et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient's clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS).

Methods: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques (MIT) expert center with more than 85% of procedures done with MIT. We compared a prospective cohort of 100 patients involved in ERP between December 2015 and June 2016 to a 100 patients control group, without ERP, previously managed in the same center between April 2015 and November 2015. All the included patients were referred for hysterectomy and/or pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynaecological cancer. The primary objective was to achieve a significant decrease of median LOS in the ERP group. Secondary objectives were decreases in proportion of patients achieving target LOS (2 days), morbidity and readmissions.

Results: Except a disparity in oncological indications with a higher proportion of endometrial cancer in the group with ERP vs. the group without ERP (42% vs. 22%; p = 0.003), there were no differences in patient's characteristics and surgical procedures. ERP were associated with decreases of median LOS (2.5 [0 to 11] days vs. 3 [1 to 14] days; p = 0.002) and proportion of discharged patient at target LOS (45% vs. 24%; p = 0.002). Morbidities occurred in 25% and 26% in the groups with and without ERP and readmission rates were respectively of 6% and 8%, without any significant difference.

Conclusion: ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery is associated with a decrease of LOS without increases of morbidity or readmission rates, even in a center with a high proportion of MIT. Although it is already widely accepted that MIT improves early recovery, our study shows that the addition of ERP's clinical pathways improve surgical outcomes and patient care management.

Keywords: Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast-track programs; Gynaecological oncology surgery; Medical care enhancement; Minimally invasive techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was approved by our institutional review board (IPC - Comité d’Orientation Stratégique).

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were done in accordance with the French ethical standards and with the 2008 Helsinki declaration.

All included patients provided written informed consent before surgery.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Compliance (%) with peri operative ERP’s criteria. Abbreviations: MBP, mechanical bowel preparation; PONV, prevention of nausea and vomiting; TED, thromboembolic deterrent
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Length of stay (in nights spent) before and after ERP
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–641. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003;362:1921–1928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, Lewis SR, Alderson P, Smith AF. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg. 2014;101:172–188. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9394. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T, et al. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kroon U-B, Rådström M, Hjelthe C, Dahlin C, Kroon L. Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151:203–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.04.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources