Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Apr;86(7):2276-80.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.7.2276.

Lack of DNA homology in a pair of divergent chromosomes greatly sensitizes them to loss by DNA damage

Affiliations

Lack of DNA homology in a pair of divergent chromosomes greatly sensitizes them to loss by DNA damage

M A Resnick et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr.

Abstract

Chromosomal DNA is considered a priori to be a target for the induction of numerical (whole chromosome) aneuploidy in mitotic cells. If true, DNA repair would be expected to contribute to genome stability. One type of repair that appears to play an important role in the response of many organisms to DNA-damaging agents involves recombination. Using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing a pair of DNA divergent (homoeologous) chromosomes, we have been able to determine the importance of recombinational repair of DNA damage in the maintenance of chromosome number. Specifically, the induction of aneuploidy by ionizing radiation has been examined in diploids that had one chromosome III replaced by a divergent chromosome from Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. The chromosomes are functionally equivalent but lack precise DNA homology over one-half their length. The absence of homology, and thus the opportunity for recombinational repair (presumably of DNA double-strand breaks) in the divergent chromosomes, results in high levels (5-10%) of aneuploidy for chromosome III at doses of radiation resulting in almost no killing. For homologous chromosomes, the frequency of loss is 20-50 times lower.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mutat Res. 1973 Oct;20(1):45-51 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1978 Apr;88(4 Pt 1):651-71 - PubMed
    1. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Jan 16;143(2):119-29 - PubMed
    1. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97-106 - PubMed
    1. Mutat Res. 1977 Jan;42(1):131-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources