Physical, biomechanical, histologic, and biochemical effects of rapid versus conventional tissue expansion
- PMID: 2928404
- DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198904000-00015
Physical, biomechanical, histologic, and biochemical effects of rapid versus conventional tissue expansion
Abstract
Clinical tissue expansion has been quite successful but takes 2 to 3 months. This study compares the effects of a conventional tissue expansion regimen of 6 weeks with an accelerated regimen of 2 weeks in the dog model, which is biomechanically similar to the human. In 22 dogs, the skin expanded 34.4 percent in the 2-week and 35.8 percent in the 6-week protocol, excluding stretch and recruitment. There was thinning of the panniculus carnosus in the 6-week group and otherwise no significant decrease in dermal thickness in either group. The biomechanical properties of elasticity and creep did not differ in expanded skin from both groups, while stress/relaxation mildly decreased from a control value of 53.5 percent to 48.8 percent in the 6-week group (p less than 0.05). Collagen activity was increased in both the 6-week and the 2-week groups (p less than 0.001) over nonexpanded skin, and immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal procollagen antibody demonstrated collagen synthesis by dermal fibroblasts in both groups. We conclude that rapid tissue expansion did not demonstrate any deleterious effects when compared with a conventional regimen.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical properties of skin in vitro for different expansion methods.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 Oct;19(8):853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.009. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004. PMID: 15342158
-
Biomechanical comparison between conventional and rapid expansion of skin.Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Oct;56(7):660-6. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00217-0. Br J Plast Surg. 2003. PMID: 12969664
-
Animal models of human tissue expansion.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Apr;83(4):681-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198904000-00014. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989. PMID: 2784577
-
Creep vs. stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin.Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Aug;41(2):215-9. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199808000-00019. Ann Plast Surg. 1998. PMID: 9718160 Review.
-
Histology and physiology of tissue expansion.J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993 Dec;19(12):1074-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb01002.x. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993. PMID: 8282904 Review.
Cited by
-
Continuous expansion for the treatment of skin deformities.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996 Jul-Aug;20(4):347-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00228469. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996. PMID: 8791577
-
A 10/14 French silicone urinary catheter with inflatable balloon used as novel expansion device in lid reconstruction surgery.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 1;72(11):1645-1652. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1857_23. Epub 2024 Aug 14. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39186620 Free PMC article.
-
From the panniculus carnosum (PC) to the superficial fascia system (SFS).Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993 Summer;17(3):179-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00636259. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993. PMID: 8213310
-
Experimental tissue expansion induces changes in expression of procollagen I and III messenger RNA.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;252(8):475-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02114754. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1995. PMID: 8719589
-
A prospective analysis of dynamic loss of breast projection in tissue expander-implant reconstruction.Arch Plast Surg. 2015 May;42(3):309-15. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.309. Epub 2015 May 14. Arch Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26015886 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources