Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):e0190147.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190147. eCollection 2017.

Policies for biosimilar uptake in Europe: An overview

Affiliations

Policies for biosimilar uptake in Europe: An overview

Evelien Moorkens et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Across European countries, differences exist in biosimilar policies, leading to variations in uptake of biosimilars and divergences in savings all over Europe.

Objectives: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of different initiatives and policies that may influence the uptake of biosimilars in different European countries. Recommendations will be formulated on how to create sustainable uptake.

Methods: An overview of policies on biosimilars was obtained via a questionnaire, supplemented with relevant articles. Topics were organized in five themes: availability, pricing, reimbursement, demand-side policies, and recommendations to enhance uptake.

Results: In all countries studied, biological medicines are available. Restrictions are mainly dependent on local organization of the healthcare system. Countries are willing to include biosimilars for reimbursement, but for commercial reasons they are not always marketed. In two thirds of countries, originator and biosimilar products may be subjected to internal reference pricing systems. Few countries have implemented specific incentives targeting physicians. Several countries are implementing pharmacist substitution; however, the scope and rules governing such substitution tend to vary between these countries. Reported educational policies tend to target primarily physicians, whereas fewer initiatives were reported for patients. Recommendations as proposed by the different country experts ranged from the need for information and communication on biosimilars to competitive pricing, more support for switching and guidance on substitution.

Conclusions: Most countries have put in place specific supply-side policies for promoting access to biosimilars. To supplement these measures, we propose that investments should be made to clearly communicate on biosimilars and educate stakeholders. Especially physicians need to be informed on the entry and use of biosimilars in order to create trust. When physicians are well-informed on the treatment options, further incentives should be offered to prescribe biosimilars. Gainsharing can be used as an incentive to prescribe, dispense or use biosimilars. This approach, in combination with binding quota, may support a sustainable biosimilar market.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Steven Simoens, Isabelle Huys, and Arnold G. Vulto are the founders of the KU Leuven Fund on Market Analysis of Biologics and Biosimilars following Loss of Exclusivity. Steven Simoens, Isabelle Huys, and Arnold G. Vulto are conducting biosimilar research sponsored by Hospira (now Pfizer). Steven Simoens is involved in a stakeholder roundtable on biosimilars sponsored by Amgen, Pfizer and MSD, and has participated in an advisory board meeting on biosimilars for Pfizer. Arnold G. Vulto is involved in consulting, advisory work and speaking engagements for a number of companies, a.o. AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, EGA, Pfizer/Hospira, Mundipharma, Roche, Sandoz. Pieter Dylst was employed full-time by Medicines for Europe at the time of the study and did not receive any honoraria from pharmaceutical companies. Gianluca Trifirò participated in the last five years in expert meeting boards organized by Sandoz and Hospira. Simona Mencej Bedrač declares that she was an employee of Lek Pharmaceuticals d. d. (Sandoz group). All remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. These interests do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

    1. Geynisman DM, De Velasco G, Sewell KL, Jacobs I. Biosimilar biologic drugs: a new frontier in medical care. Postgrad Med. 2017;129(4):460–70. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1311196 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Outlook for global medicines through 2021—Balancing cost and value Parsippany: QuintilesIMS Institute; 2016.
    1. Kawalec P, Stawowczyk E, Tesar T, Skoupa J, Turcu-Stiolica A, Dimitrova M, et al. Pricing and Reimbursement of Biosimilars in Central and Eastern European Countries. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:288 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00288 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Delivering on the potential of biosimilar medicines—The role of functioning competitive markets IMS institute for healthcare informatics; 2016.
    1. Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Union. 2001(L 311):67–128

Substances

LinkOut - more resources