Clinical studies on core-carrier obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 29284463
- PMCID: PMC5747112
- DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0459-1
Clinical studies on core-carrier obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of core-carrier obturation in endodontic treatment.
Methods: Keywords of "(core carrier OR Thermafil) OR (cold lateral condensation OR lateral condensation) OR (warm vertical condensation OR vertical condensation) AND (obturation OR root canal filling) AND clinical study" were searched for all obtainable publications up to year 2017 in the databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science. The success rate, short-term postoperative pain, overfilling and adaptation of core-carrier obturation from clinical studies were selected. Reviews, laboratory studies, animal studies and irrelevant reports were excluded.
Results: 1349 relevant articles were identified with 149 duplicated articles removed and 1173 irrelevant articles were excluded after screening. The titles and abstracts of the 19 identified articles were screened in the systematic review. The full texts of remaining articles were retrieved with data extracted for meta-analysis on the success rate, postoperative pain, overfilling and adaptation of obturation. The pooled success rate of core-carrier obturation was 83% (95% CI: 69%-91%). The pooled incidence of 1-day and 7-day short-term postoperative pain were 35% (95% CI: 15%-62%) and 6% (95% CI: 1-35%). The pooled proportion of teeth with overfilling and adequate adaptation of the obturation material were 31% (95% CI: 18%-50%) and 85% (95% CI: 75%-91%), respectively.
Conclusions: The success rate of endodontic treatment using core-carrier obturation was 83%. Short-term postoperative pain was not uncommon (24%). Most teeth (85%) had adequate adaptation using core-carrier obturation material, but a considerable amount of teeth (31%) had overfilling.
Keywords: Core carrier; Endodontics; Meta-analysis; Obturation; Systematic review; Thermafil.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
It is not applicable in the study because it does not report on or involve the use of any animal or human data or tissue.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Competing interests
All co-authors declare that they have no financial affiliation (e.g. political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual or any other), or involvement with any commercial organization with direct financial interests in the subject or materials discussed in this manuscript, nor have any such arrangements existed in the past 5 years. Any other potential conflict of interest is disclosed.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures



References
-
- Glickman GN, Koch KA. 21ST-century endodontics. JADA. 2000;131, Supplement 1(0):39S-46S. - PubMed
-
- Neukermans M, Vanobbergen J, De Bruyne M, Meire M, De Moor RJ. Endodontic performance by Flemish dentists: have they evolved? Int Endod J. 2015;48(12):1112–21. - PubMed
-
- Chan AW, Low D, Cheung GS, Ng RP. A questionnaire survey of endodontic practice profile among dentists in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Dent J. 2006;3:80–87.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources