Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 27;7(12):e014633.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014633.

Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapers

Affiliations

Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapers

Alice R Kininmonth et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the quality of nutrition articles in popular national daily newspapers in the UK and to identify important predictors of article quality.

Setting: Newspapers are a primary source of nutrition information for the public.

Design: Newspaper articles were collected on 6 days of the week (excluding Sunday) for 6 weeks in summer 2014. Predictors included food type and health outcome, size of article, whether the journalist was named and day of the week.

Outcome measures: A validated quality assessment tool was used to assess each article, with a minimum possible score of -12 and a maximum score of 17. Newspapers were checked in duplicate for relevant articles. The association of each predictor on article quality score was analysed adjusting for remaining predictors. A logistic regression model was implemented with quality score as the binary outcome, categorised as poor (score less than zero) or satisfactory (score of zero or more).

Results: Over 6 weeks, 141 nutrition articles were included across the five newspapers. The median quality score was 2 (IQR -2-6), and 44 (31%) articles were poor quality. There was no substantial variation in quality of reporting between newspapers once other factors such as anonymous publishing, health outcome, aspect of diet covered and day of the week were taken into account. Particularly low-quality scores were obtained for anonymously published articles with no named journalist, articles that focused on obesity and articles that reported on high fat and processed foods.

Conclusions: The general public are regularly exposed to poor quality information in newspapers about what to eat to promote health, particularly articles reporting on obesity. Journalists, researchers, university press officers and scientific journals need to work together more closely to ensure clear, consistent nutrition messages are communicated to the public in an engaging way.

Keywords: media; newspaper; nutrition communication; obesity; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. British Heart Foundation. CVD statistics: BHF UK factsheet. London: British Heart Foundation, 2016.
    1. Rayner M, Scarborough P. The burden of food related ill health in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:1054–7. 10.1136/jech.2005.036491 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scarborough P, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe KK, et al. . The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006-07 NHS costs. J Public Health 2011;33:527–35. 10.1093/pubmed/fdr033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scarborough P, Nnoaham KE, Clarke D, et al. . Modelling the impact of a healthy diet on cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:420–6. 10.1136/jech.2010.114520 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leask J, Hooker C, King C. Media coverage of health issues and how to work more effectively with journalists: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:535 10.1186/1471-2458-10-535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed