Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;14(4):223-230.

Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries

Affiliations

Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries

Mehrdad Abdinian et al. J Dent (Tehran). 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: When a patient has cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images based on the treatment plan, it is possible to use these images for evaluation of caries, and there is no need for new radiographs, according to the "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) principle. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of filtration and thickness of CBCT cross-sections on detection of proximal caries.

Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, 100 teeth were placed in the dental sockets of a dry skull, and were fixed in normal proximal contacts. CBCT images were taken and were evaluated by two observers on the panoramic view at 1-, 3- and 5-mm-thick cross-sections, with the use of filtrations 0, 1 and 2. Afterwards, the samples were sectioned and underwent a histological evaluation. McNemar's test was used to compare the findings on CBCT images and histological evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different cross-sections.

Results: The maximum AZ-value was achieved at 3-mm thickness/filtration 2. However, the differences between 1-mm thickness/filtration 2 and 1-mm thickness/filtration 1 were not significant (P=0.728 and 0.868, respectively). The minimum AZ-value was achieved at 5-mm thickness/filtration 0.

Conclusions: Although CBCT is not sufficiently effective in detecting caries, the best cross-sections for detection of proximal caries were achieved at 3-mm thickness/filtration 2, 1-mm thickness/filtration 2 and 1-mm thickness/filtration 1.

Keywords: Dental Caries; Diagnosis; Radiography; Tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Placement of the teeth in a normal anatomical position
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
CBCT image of the skull holding the teeth
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
ROC curve of different filtrations and thicknesses (pan th1f0= thickness 1 filtration 0, pan th1f1=thickness 1 filtration 1, pan th1f2= thickness 1 filtration 2, pan th3f0= thickness 3 filtration 0, pan th3f1=thickness 3 filtration 1, pan th3f2= thickness 3 filtration 2, pan th5f0= thickness 5 filtration 0, pan th5f1=thickness 5 filtration 1, pan th5f2= thickness 5 filtration 2)

References

    1. Pereira AC, Verdonschot EH, Huysmans MC. Caries detection methods: can they aid decision making for invasive sealant treatment? Caries Res. 2001. Mar-Apr;35(2):83–9. - PubMed
    1. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J. 2001. April 28;190(8):440–3. - PubMed
    1. Ohki M, Okano T, Nakamura T. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994. May;23(2):77–82. - PubMed
    1. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013:285.
    1. Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Ucok O, Yuksel SP, Ozen T, Avsever H. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010. December;39(8):501–11. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources