Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Dec;44(6):917-925.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0891-6. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

Are large fracture trials really possible? What we have learned from the randomized controlled damage control study?

Eva Steinhausen  1   2 , Bertil Bouillon  3   4 , Dieter Rixen  3 ; Members of the damage control study group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Are large fracture trials really possible? What we have learned from the randomized controlled damage control study?

Eva Steinhausen et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Although they are considered the 'gold standard' of evidence-based medicine, randomized controlled trials are still a rarity in orthopedic surgery. In the management of patients with multiple trauma, there is a current trend toward 'damage control orthopedics', but to date, there is no proof of the superiority of this concept in terms of evidence-based medicine. The purpose of this article is to present unexpected difficulties we encountered in successfully completing our randomized controlled trial and to discuss the problematic differences between theoretically planning a trial and real-life practical experience of implementing the plan, with attention to published strategies.

Methods: The multicenter randomized controlled trial on risk adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple trauma patients (DCO study) was designed to determine whether 'risk adapted damage control orthopedics' of femoral shaft fractures is advantageous when treating multiple trauma patients. We compared our methods of study planning and realization point by point with published methods for conducting such trials.

Results: The study was methodically planned. We met the most prerequisites for successfully completing a large fracture trial, but experienced unexpected difficulties. After 2.5 years, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft suspended the financing because of low recruitment. The reasons were multifactorial.

Conclusions: We believe it is much more difficult to perform a large fracture trial in reality than to plan it in theory. Even the theoretically best designed trial can prove unsuccessful in its implementation. The question remains: are large fracture trials even possible? Hopefully YES!

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10321620. Date assigned: 09/02/2007.

Level of evidence: Level I.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Damage control; Femoral fracture; Multiple trauma; Randomized trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Mar;84-A(3):388-96 - PubMed
    1. Injury. 2008 Jun;39(6):636-42 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2009 Apr 25;373(9673):1455-61 - PubMed
    1. Injury. 2006 Apr;37(4):355-60 - PubMed
    1. Unfallchirurg. 2001 Mar;104(3):230-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources