Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU

Affiliations
Observational Study

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU

Shamim Nemati et al. Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Sepsis is among the leading causes of morbidity, mortality, and cost overruns in critically ill patients. Early intervention with antibiotics improves survival in septic patients. However, no clinically validated system exists for real-time prediction of sepsis onset. We aimed to develop and validate an Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm for early prediction of sepsis.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: Academic medical center from January 2013 to December 2015.

Patients: Over 31,000 admissions to the ICUs at two Emory University hospitals (development cohort), in addition to over 52,000 ICU patients from the publicly available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III ICU database (validation cohort). Patients who met the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) prior to or within 4 hours of their ICU admission were excluded, resulting in roughly 27,000 and 42,000 patients within our development and validation cohorts, respectively.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: High-resolution vital signs time series and electronic medical record data were extracted. A set of 65 features (variables) were calculated on hourly basis and passed to the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm to predict onset of sepsis in the proceeding T hours (where T = 12, 8, 6, or 4). Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert was used to predict onset of sepsis in the proceeding T hours and to produce a list of the most significant contributing factors. For the 12-, 8-, 6-, and 4-hour ahead prediction of sepsis, Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic in the range of 0.83-0.85. Performance of the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert on the development and validation cohorts was indistinguishable.

Conclusions: Using data available in the ICU in real-time, Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert can accurately predict the onset of sepsis in an ICU patient 4-12 hours prior to clinical recognition. A prospective study is necessary to determine the clinical utility of the proposed sepsis prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any remaining conflicts of interest. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the author/speaker and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting tsepsis 4 hours in advance. Catching 85% of the septic patients yielded 30% false alarms (SP=0.70) within the training set (left panel) and 33% false alarms (SP=0.67) within the testing set (right panel). See Table 2 for information on the false alarms.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Summary of training set (dashed lines) and testing set (solid lines) prediction performance of AISE on the Emory cohort. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) as a function of prediction window shows a decreasing pattern. Across all windows, the best performance is achieved for predicting tSOFA, followed by tsepsis, and finally tonset. A close agreement between the training set and testing set performance indicates good generalizability.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
An illustrative example of the prediction performance of AISE. Hourly calculated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, Sepsis-3 definition, and the AISE score are shown for one patient in Panel (A). Superimposed on the figure is the order-time of three blood cultures, and the administration-time of two antibiotics. In Panel (B), commonly recorded hourly vital signs of the patient, including heart rate (HR), Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP), Respiratory Rate (RESP), Temperature (TEMP), Oxygen Saturation (O2Sat) and the Glascow Coma Score (GCS) are shown. Panel (C) shows the most significant features contributing to the AISE score (for clarity of presentation only selected time-points are shown). Notably, around 4pm on December 20th, roughly 8 hours prior to any change in the SOFA score, the AISE score starts to increase. The top contributing factors were slight changes in HR, RESP, and TEMP, given that the patient had surgery in the past 12 hours with a contaminated wound, and was on a mechanical ventilator. Close to midnight on December 21st, other factors such as multiscale entropy of MAP time series (BPV1), GCS, and Lactate show abnormal changes. Five hours later, the patient met the sepsis-3 definition of sepsis.

References

    1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1303–10. - PubMed
    1. Arise AAM Committee. The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Resusc. 2007;9(1):8–18. - PubMed
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54. - PubMed
    1. Stoller J, Halpin L, Weis M, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis: 2008–2012. J Crit Care. 2016;31(1):58–62. - PubMed
    1. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2235–2244. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms