Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2018 Feb;154(3):736-745.e14.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Consensus Recommendations

Collaborators, Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Consensus Recommendations

Denis Hadjiliadis et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background & aims: Improved therapy has substantially increased survival of persons with cystic fibrosis (CF). But the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults with CF is 5-10 times greater compared to the general population, and 25-30 times greater in CF patients after an organ transplantation. To address this risk, the CF Foundation convened a multi-stakeholder task force to develop CRC screening recommendations.

Methods: The 18-member task force consisted of experts including pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a social worker, nurse coordinator, surgeon, epidemiologist, statistician, CF adult, and a parent. The committee comprised 3 workgroups: Cancer Risk, Transplant, and Procedure and Preparation. A guidelines specialist at the CF Foundation conducted an evidence synthesis February-March 2016 based on PubMed literature searches. Task force members conducted additional independent searches. A total of 1159 articles were retrieved. After initial screening, the committee read 198 articles in full and analyzed 123 articles to develop recommendation statements. An independent decision analysis evaluating the benefits of screening relative to harms and resources required was conducted by the Department of Public Health at Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands using the Microsimulation Screening Analysis model from the Cancer Innervation and Surveillance Modeling Network. The task force included recommendation statements in the final guideline only if they reached an 80% acceptance threshold.

Results: The task force makes 10 CRC screening recommendations that emphasize shared, individualized decision-making and familiarity with CF-specific gastrointestinal challenges. We recommend colonoscopy as the preferred screening method, initiation of screening at age 40 years, 5-year re-screening and 3-year surveillance intervals (unless shorter interval is indicated by individual findings), and a CF-specific intensive bowel preparation. Organ transplant recipients with CF should initiate CRC screening at age 30 years within 2 years of the transplantation because of the additional risk for colon cancer associated with immunosuppression.

Conclusions: These recommendations aim to help CF adults, families, primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, and CF and transplantation centers address the issue of CRC screening. They differ from guidelines developed for the general population with respect to the recommended age of screening initiation, screening method, preparation, and the interval for repeat screening and surveillance.

Keywords: CFTR; Cancer; Colon; Colonoscopy; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Cystic Fibrosis; Intestine; Large Bowel; Recommendations; Rectum; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Search strategy diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical decision support tool for CRC screening with colonoscopy in adults with CF. *Negative = no adenomatous polyps on examination with good to excellent bowel preparation (score ≥6 on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale). Testing should be repeated if the bowel preparation is not considered good. Screen = screening colonoscopy.

Comment in

  • Cancer Risk in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.
    Ponzetto A, Holton J, Lucia U. Ponzetto A, et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jun;154(8):2282-2283. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.040. Epub 2018 May 5. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 29738750 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Hadjiliadis D, Khoruts A, Zauber AG, Hempstead SE, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Hadjiliadis D, et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jun;154(8):2283-2284. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 8. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 29750906 No abstract available.

References

    1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry 2015 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, 2016.
    1. Maisonneuve P, FitzSimmons SC, Neglia JP, Campbell PW 3rd, Lowenfels AB. Cancer risk in non-transplanted and transplanted cystic fibrosis patients: a 10-year study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:381–387. - PubMed
    1. Maisonneuve P, Marshall BC, Knapp EA, Lowenfels AB. Cancer risk in cystic fibrosis: a 20-year nationwide study from the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:122–129. - PubMed
    1. Fink AK, Yanik EL, Marshall BC, et al. Cancer risk among lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2016;16:91–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neglia JP, FitzSimmons SC, Maisonneuve P, et al. The risk of cancer among patients with cystic fibrosis. Cystic Fibrosis and Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;332:494–499. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms