Virtual Pediatric Patient Activities With Randomized Scenarios as an Instructional Tool for Pharmacy Students
- PMID: 29290745
- PMCID: PMC5736257
- DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.6.444
Virtual Pediatric Patient Activities With Randomized Scenarios as an Instructional Tool for Pharmacy Students
Abstract
Objectives: To assess student pharmacist best activity scores and related exam question performance based on the number of pediatric virtual patient activity (VPA) attempts.
Methods: A 40-point asthma VPA was implemented and included three possible randomized scenarios. A 60-point meningitis VPA was implemented and included three possible randomized scenarios followed by an additional three possible randomized scenarios only if the first scenario was correctly completed. Points were awarded in the VPA based on appropriateness of treatment decisions. Students were allowed unlimited VPA attempts individually and as a group in class. Three exam questions were based on a fourth scenario of each randomized portion of the VPAs. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and T-test were used for statistical comparisons when appropriate.
Results: Of 132 students, median individual best asthma VPA scores were 15.25, 22, and 30 for those with 1, 2, and ≥3 asthma attempts, respectively (p < 0.001). Median individual best meningitis VPA scores were 4, 5, 7, and 45.5 for those with 1, 2, 3 to 4, and ≥5 attempts, respectively (p < 0.001). Median number of group VPA attempts was higher among students who correctly answered the exam question related to the first randomized meningitis scenario (10 versus 4, p = 0.015), although no differences in attempts were found for the other related questions (all p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Students who completed the VPAs more times achieved greater individual best scores. Students who correctly answered related exam questions had a higher number of group VPA attempts only when continuation of the VPA required correct randomized scenario completion.
Keywords: active learning; educational technology; pediatrics; simulation training; virtual patients.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures Some data from this manuscript were published in abstract form and presented as a poster presentation at the 2016 Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia on April 29, 2016. The authors declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria. JSS had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis.
Figures
References
-
- Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. . Accreditation standards. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2017.
-
- Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR.. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Logman; 2001.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources