Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):76-82.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0605.R1.

A functional comparison of medial pivot and condylar knee designs based on patient outcomes and parameters of gait

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A functional comparison of medial pivot and condylar knee designs based on patient outcomes and parameters of gait

B Benjamin et al. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: The outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not always satisfactory. The purpose of this study was to identify satisfaction and biomechanical features characterising the gait of patients who had undergone TKA with either an anatomical single radius design or a medial pivot design. We hypothesised that the latter would provide superior function.

Patients and methods: This is a study of a subset of patients recruited into a prospective randomised study of a single radius design versus a medial pivot design, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Outcome measurements included clinical scores (Knee Society Score (KSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) and gait analysis using an instrumented treadmill.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for both the KSS and OKS. There was also no statistical significance in cadence, walking speed, stride length and stance time, peak stride, mid support and push-off forces.

Conclusion: This study corroborates a previous study by the same authors that showed equally good results in clinical outcome and gait between the conventional single radius and medial pivot designs under stringent testing conditions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;(1 Supple A)100-B:76-82.

Keywords: Clinical scores; Gait; Medial pivot knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anatomical single radius design.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MCBS design.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graph showing analysis of the pattern of gait using force plates built into treadmill. Red is for left and blue is for right lower limbs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Analysis of parameters of gait.
Figs. 5a - 5c
Figs. 5a - 5c
Analysis of parameters of force in gait: a) peak force in stride (p = 034); b) mid support force in stride (p = 0.17); c), push-off force (p = 0.74).
Figs. 5a - 5c
Figs. 5a - 5c
Analysis of parameters of force in gait: a) peak force in stride (p = 034); b) mid support force in stride (p = 0.17); c), push-off force (p = 0.74).
Figs. 5a - 5c
Figs. 5a - 5c
Analysis of parameters of force in gait: a) peak force in stride (p = 034); b) mid support force in stride (p = 0.17); c), push-off force (p = 0.74).

References

    1. Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;464:27–31. - PubMed
    1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:57–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton DF, Howie CR, Burnett R, Simpson AHRW, Patton JT. Dealing with the predicted increase in demand for revision total knee arthroplasty: challenges, risks and opportunities. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:723–728. - PubMed
    1. No authors listed. National joint registry for England and Wales 10th annual report 2013. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Report... (date last accessed 11 September 2017).
    1. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1487–1497. - PubMed

Publication types