Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;46(7):1041-1048.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002926.

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality After Rapid Response Team Calls in a 274 Hospital Nationwide Sample

Collaborators, Affiliations

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality After Rapid Response Team Calls in a 274 Hospital Nationwide Sample

Claire Shappell et al. Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: Despite wide adoption of rapid response teams across the United States, predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients receiving rapid response team calls are poorly characterized. Identification of patients at high risk of death during hospitalization could improve triage to intensive care units and prompt timely reevaluations of goals of care. We sought to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients who are subjects of rapid response team calls and to develop and validate a predictive model for death after rapid response team call.

Design: Analysis of data from the national Get with the Guidelines-Medical Emergency Team event registry.

Setting: Two-hundred seventy four hospitals participating in Get with the Guidelines-Medical Emergency Team from June 2005 to February 2015.

Patients: 282,710 hospitalized adults on surgical or medical wards who were subjects of a rapid response team call.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was death during hospitalization; candidate predictors included patient demographic- and event-level characteristics. Patients who died after rapid response team were older (median age 72 vs 66 yr), were more likely to be admitted for noncardiac medical illness (70% vs 58%), and had greater median length of stay prior to rapid response team (81 vs 47 hr) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The prediction model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.78-0.79), with systolic blood pressure, time since admission, and respiratory rate being the most important variables.

Conclusions: Patients who die following rapid response team calls differ significantly from surviving peers. Recognition of these factors could improve postrapid response team triage decisions and prompt timely goals of care discussions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In-hospital mortality by trigger type and number of triggers for Rapid Response Team calls. aIncludes respiratory depression, tachypnea, difficulty breathing, and hypoxia. bIncludes bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension, and chest pain. cIncludes mental status change, agitation or delirium, loss of consciousness, seizure, and suspected stroke
Figure 2
Figure 2
Importance of the predictor variables in the gradient boosted machine model, scaled to a maximum of 100
Figure 3
Figure 3
Area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUCs) of the gradient boosted machine algorithm by institution type and in all hospitals (solid vertical line) in the validation cohorts.

Comment in

References

    1. Edelson DP, Yuen TC, Mancini ME, et al. Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(6):353–357. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steel AC, Reynolds SF. The growth of rapid response systems. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(8):489–495. 433. - PubMed
    1. Priestley G, Watson W, Rashidian A, et al. Introducing Critical Care Outreach: a ward-randomised trial of phased introduction in a general hospital. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(7):1398–1404. - PubMed
    1. Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, et al. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9477):2091–2097. - PubMed
    1. Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J. Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:254. - PMC - PubMed