Temporal Trends in Healthcare Costs and Outcome Following ICU Admission After Traumatic Brain Injury
- PMID: 29293155
- PMCID: PMC5865506
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002959
Temporal Trends in Healthcare Costs and Outcome Following ICU Admission After Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
Objective: To assess temporal trends in 1-year healthcare costs and outcome of intensive care for traumatic brain injury in Finland.
Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting: Multicenter study including four tertiary ICUs.
Patients: Three thousand fifty-one adult patients (≥ 18 yr) with significant traumatic brain injury treated in a tertiary ICU during 2003-2013.
Intervention: None.
Measurements and main results: Total 1-year healthcare costs included the index hospitalization costs, rehabilitation unit costs, and social security reimbursements. All costs are reported as 2013 U.S. dollars ($). Outcomes were 1-year mortality and permanent disability. Multivariate regression models, adjusting for case-mix, were used to assess temporal trends in costs and outcome in predefined Glasgow Coma Scale (3-8, 9-12, and 13-15) and age (18-40, 41-64, and ≥ 65 yr) subgroups. Overall 1-year survival was 76% (n = 2,304), and of 1-year survivors, 37% (n = 850) were permanently disabled. Mean unadjusted 1-year healthcare cost was $39,809 (95% CI, $38,144-$41,473) per patient. Adjusted healthcare costs decreased only in the Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15 and 65 years and older subgroups, due to lower rehabilitation costs. Adjusted 1-year mortality did not change in any subgroup (p < 0.05 for all subgroups). Adjusted risk of permanent disability decreased significantly in all subgroups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: During the last decade, healthcare costs of ICU-admitted traumatic brain injury patients have remained largely the same in Finland. No change in mortality was noted, but the risk for permanent disability decreased significantly. Thus, our results suggest that cost-effectiveness of traumatic brain injury care has improved during the past decade in Finland.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Laitio received funding from Consultancy for Valvira, Finland (National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health). Dr. Skrifvars’ institution received funding from Finska Läkaresällskapet, and he received funding from Svenska Kulturfonden. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Maas AIR, Menon DK, Steyerberg EW, et al. Collaborative European neurotrauma effectiveness research in traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI): A prospective longitudinal observational study. Neurosurgery 2015; 76:67–80. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization: Investing in health research and development: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Health Research Relating to Future Intervention Options [Internet]. 1996. Geneva, Switzerland: Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/63024/1/TDR_Gen_96.1_pp1-34.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2017
-
- Reinikainen M, Uusaro A, Niskanen M, et al. Intensive care of the elderly in Finland. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:522–529. - PubMed
-
- Halpern NA, Pastores SM, Greenstein RJ. Critical care medicine in the United States 1985–2000: An analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1254–1259. - PubMed
-
- Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: An analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:65–71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical