Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec 14;7(6):351-357.
doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1403830. eCollection 2017.

Piloting a patient safety and quality improvement co-curriculum

Affiliations
Review

Piloting a patient safety and quality improvement co-curriculum

Claudia Kroker-Bode et al. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the push for resident and faculty involvement in patient safety (PS) and quality improvement (QI), there is limited literature describing programs that train them to conduct PS/QI projects. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a co-learning PS/QI curriculum. Method: The authors implemented a co-learning (residents and faculty together) PS/QI curriculum within our general Internal Medicine program over 1 year. The curriculum consisted of two workshops, between-session guidance, and final presentation. The authors evaluated effectiveness by self-assessment of attitude, knowledge, and behavior change and PS/QI project completion. Results: Thirty-eight of 32 (95%) resident and 8 faculty member participants attended the workshops and 27 of 40 (67%) completed the evaluation. Participants (87-96%) responded favorably regarding workshop effectiveness. The authors found significant improvement in 78% of items pertaining to PS/QI knowledge/skills, but no difference for attitudinal items. The final project evaluation participants rated project content as relevant to learning needs (75%); training as well-organized (75%); faculty mentorship for the project as supportive (75%); and the overall project as excellent or very good (71%). Conclusion: The authors successfully demonstrated a framework for co-teaching faculty and residents to conduct PS/QI projects. Participants acquired necessary tools to practice in an ever-evolving clinical setting emphasizing a patient-centered and quality-focused environment.

Keywords: Quality improvement; co-learning; curriculum; faculty; patient safety; residents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

    1. ACGME CLER http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/436/ProgramandInstitutionalAccredita... Available from:
    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IoM Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. Ogrinc G, Headrick LA, Mutha S, et al. A framework for teaching medical students and residents about practice-based learning and improvement, synthesized from a literature review. Acad Med. 2003;78:748–756. - PubMed
    1. Wong BM, Goguen J, Shojania KG.. Building capacity for quality: a pilot co-learning curriculum in quality improvement for faculty and resident learners. J Grad Med Edu. 2013;5:689–693. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources