Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 22;1(19):1617-1627.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017008789.

Patient-centered care coordination in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Patient-centered care coordination in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Nandita Khera et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an expensive, resource-intensive, and medically complicated modality for treatment of many hematologic disorders. A well-defined care coordination model through the continuum can help improve health care delivery for this high-cost, high-risk medical technology. In addition to the patients and their families, key stakeholders include not only the transplantation physicians and care teams (including subspecialists), but also hematologists/oncologists in private and academic-affiliated practices. Initial diagnosis and care, education regarding treatment options including HCT, timely referral to the transplantation center, and management of relapse and late medical or psychosocial complications after HCT are areas where the referring hematologists/oncologists play a significant role. Payers and advocacy and community organizations are additional stakeholders in this complex care continuum. In this article, we describe a care coordination framework for patients treated with HCT within the context of coordination issues in care delivery and stakeholders involved. We outline the challenges in implementing such a model and describe a simplified approach at the level of the individual practice or center. This article also highlights ongoing efforts from physicians, medical directors, payer representatives, and patient advocates to help raise awareness of and develop access to adequate tools and resources for the oncology community to deliver well-coordinated care to patients treated with HCT. Lastly, we set the stage for policy changes around appropriate reimbursement to cover all aspects of care coordination and generate successful buy-in from all stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: P.M., A.B., and C.F.L. are employed by for-profit companies (Anthem Inc., Optum, and HCA-Sarah Cannon, respectively) and hold stock/ownership interests. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phases in the HCT continuum and involvement of main stakeholders. Follow-up care can take place at the transplantation center for a few patients, but most other patients return to their referring hematology/oncology providers. LTFU, long-term follow-up; PCP, primary care provider.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Issues and stakeholders in care coordination. Evaluation (A), pretransplantation (B), transplantation event (C), and follow-up care (D). AD, administrator; C, consulting; CC, care coordinator; CG, caregiver; CP, consulting provider; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; Hem/Onc, hematologist/oncologist; I, informed; P, payer; PCM, payer case manager; Pt, patient; R, responsible; SSI, supplemental security income; SW, social worker; TC, transplant center; TFC, transplantation financial coordinator; TP, transplantation physician.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Issues and stakeholders in care coordination. Evaluation (A), pretransplantation (B), transplantation event (C), and follow-up care (D). AD, administrator; C, consulting; CC, care coordinator; CG, caregiver; CP, consulting provider; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; Hem/Onc, hematologist/oncologist; I, informed; P, payer; PCM, payer case manager; Pt, patient; R, responsible; SSI, supplemental security income; SW, social worker; TC, transplant center; TFC, transplantation financial coordinator; TP, transplantation physician.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Issues and stakeholders in care coordination. Evaluation (A), pretransplantation (B), transplantation event (C), and follow-up care (D). AD, administrator; C, consulting; CC, care coordinator; CG, caregiver; CP, consulting provider; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; Hem/Onc, hematologist/oncologist; I, informed; P, payer; PCM, payer case manager; Pt, patient; R, responsible; SSI, supplemental security income; SW, social worker; TC, transplant center; TFC, transplantation financial coordinator; TP, transplantation physician.

References

    1. Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Owens DK, eds. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Vol 7 Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. AHRQ Publication No. 04(07)-0051-7. - PubMed
    1. McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, et al. Definitions of care coordination and related terms. In: Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Owens DK, eds. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Vol 7 Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. AHRQ Publication No. 04(07)-0051-7.
    1. Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA. 2009;301(6):603-618. - PubMed
    1. Stanton MW. The High Concentration of U.S. Health Care Expenditures. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. AHRQ publication no. 06-0060.
    1. Page RD, Newcomer LN, Sprandio JD, McAneny BL. The patient-centered medical home in oncology: from concept to reality. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015;2015:e82-e89. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources