Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Mar 15;24(6):1287-1295.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2653. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Phase I Trial of M7824 (MSB0011359C), a Bifunctional Fusion Protein Targeting PD-L1 and TGFβ, in Advanced Solid Tumors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase I Trial of M7824 (MSB0011359C), a Bifunctional Fusion Protein Targeting PD-L1 and TGFβ, in Advanced Solid Tumors

Julius Strauss et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: M7824 (MSB0011359C) is an innovative first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of a mAb against programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) fused to a TGFβ "trap."Experimental Design: In the 3+3 dose-escalation component of this phase I study (NCT02517398), eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received M7824 at 1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal; in addition, a cohort received an initial 0.3 mg/kg dose to evaluate pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, followed by 10 mg/kg dosing. The primary objective is to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and best overall response.Results: Nineteen heavily pretreated patients with ECOG 0-1 have received M7824. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in four patients (skin infection secondary to localized bullous pemphigoid, asymptomatic lipase increase, colitis with associated anemia, and gastroparesis with hypokalemia). The MTD was not reached. M7824 saturated peripheral PD-L1 and sequestered any released plasma TGFβ1, -β2, and -β3 throughout the dosing period at >1 mg/kg. There were signs of efficacy across all dose levels, including one ongoing confirmed complete response (cervical cancer), two durable confirmed partial responses (PR; pancreatic cancer; anal cancer), one near-PR (cervical cancer), and two cases of prolonged stable disease in patients with growing disease at study entry (pancreatic cancer; carcinoid).Conclusions: M7824 has a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Early signs of efficacy are encouraging, and multiple expansion cohorts are ongoing in a range of tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1287-95. ©2018 AACR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

I. Grenga is currently an employee of EMD Serono. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A, Concentration versus time profile following intravenous administration of M7824. B, PD-L1 target occupancy following intravenous administration of M7824. C, Total TGFβ1, -β2, and -β3 plasma concentrations following intravenous administration of M7824.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Largest change from baseline in the sum of longest diameters according to RECIST v1.1. The dotted line at −30% indicates the threshold for a PR. Because the patient with a confirmed CR had lymph node-only disease, the sum of diameters does not reach 0. NE, not evaluable; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A, This 49-year-old woman with metastatic cervical cancer after cisplatin/taxol followed by carboplatin/taxol plus bevacizumab was enrolled with two pathologically enlarging mediastinal lymph nodes (arrows in left side of figure). Restaging scan 7.5 months after enrollment showed reduction in lymph nodes to <1 cm by short-axis measurement, meeting RECIST v1.1 criteria for a CR. CR was durable as of her 13-month restaging scan (right side of figure). B, CEA curve for patient with ongoing durable confirmed CR. C, This 61-year-old man with locally advanced pancreatic cancer s/p FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/abraxane, and XELOX was enrolled with an enlarging tumor in the pancreatic bed (arrow in left side of figure). Restaging scans at 3 months showed a PR, which was confirmed at 4.5 months. Scans at 6 months showed a 49% reduction in his disease by long-axis measurement (right side of figure). D, CEA curve for patient with pancreatic cancer with durable confirmed PR. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; FOLFIRINOX, leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; XELOX, oxaliplatin and capecitabine.

References

    1. Weber JS, D’Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:375–84. - PubMed
    1. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, Robert C, Grossmann K, McDermott D, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2006–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2521–32. - PubMed
    1. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1627–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387:1540–50. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data