Association of ALDH3B2 gene polymorphism and risk factors with susceptibility of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population: a case-control study involving 2,358 subjects
- PMID: 29299137
- PMCID: PMC5746372
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22656
Association of ALDH3B2 gene polymorphism and risk factors with susceptibility of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population: a case-control study involving 2,358 subjects
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide. The interaction of environmental risk factors and genetic factors might contribute to the carcinogenesis of EC synergistically.
Results: All seven single locus polymorphisms of ALDH3B2 were not associated with risk of ESCC as evaluated by allelic, dominant, co-dominant, recessive and Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Stratified analyses showed these SNPs were not correlated with the susceptibility of ESCC according to different age, gender, cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking status. None of the major haplotypes were related with ESCC susceptibility.
Materials and methods: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study to evaluate the combined effects of environmental risk factors and the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ALDH3B2 gene on the development of esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC). A total of 1043 ESCC cases and 1315 controls were recruited for this study. Seven ALDH3B2 SNPs and four environmental factors were selected as independent variables. ALDH3B2 SNPs were determined by ligation detection reaction method.
Conclusions: Our study suggested that ALDH3B2 rs34589365, rs3741172, rs4646823, rs78402723, rs7947978, rs866907 and rs9787887 polymorphisms were not implicated with altered susceptibility of ESCC according to different age, gender, cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking status. Yet this conclusion needs to be verified in larger studies among different ethnic populations with validation design, the biological function of these SNPs in carcinogenesis are subject to further investigation.
Keywords: ALDH3B2; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; polymorphisms; risk factors.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Figures


References
-
- Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, Allen C, Hansen G, Woodbrook R, Wolfe C, Hamadeh RR, Moore A, Werdecker A, et al. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:505–27. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390:2383–2396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31462-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Xu Y, Yu X, Chen Q, Mao W. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment: which one is better for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-173 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gammon MD, Schoenberg JB, Ahsan H, Risch HA, Vaughan TL, Chow WH, Rotterdam H, West AB, Dubrow R, Stanford JL, Mayne ST, Farrow DC, Niwa S, et al. Tobacco, alcohol, and socioeconomic status and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1277–84. - PubMed
-
- Lee CH, Wu DC, Lee JM, Wu IC, Goan YG, Kao EL, Huang HL, Chan TF, Chou SH, Chou YP, Lee CY, Chen PS, Ho CK, et al. Carcinogenetic impact of alcohol intake on squamous cell carcinoma risk of the oesophagus in relation to tobacco smoking. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1188–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.039 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases