Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 31;6(1):1.
doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6010001.

Thinking in Pharmacy Practice: A Study of Community Pharmacists' Clinical Reasoning in Medication Supply Using the Think-Aloud Method

Affiliations

Thinking in Pharmacy Practice: A Study of Community Pharmacists' Clinical Reasoning in Medication Supply Using the Think-Aloud Method

Hayley Croft et al. Pharmacy (Basel). .

Abstract

Medication review and supply by pharmacists involves both cognitive and technical skills related to the safety and appropriateness of prescribed medicines. The cognitive ability of pharmacists to recall, synthesise and memorise information is a critical aspect of safe and optimal medicines use, yet few studies have investigated the clinical reasoning and decision-making processes pharmacists use when supplying prescribed medicines. The objective of this study was to examine the patterns and processes of pharmacists' clinical reasoning and to identify the information sources used, when making decisions about the safety and appropriateness of prescribed medicines. Ten community pharmacists participated in a simulation in which they were required to review a prescription and make decisions about the safety and appropriateness of supplying the prescribed medicines to the patient, whilst at the same time thinking aloud about the tasks required. Following the simulation each pharmacist was asked a series of questions to prompt retrospective thinking aloud using video-stimulated recall. The simulated consultation and retrospective interview were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. All of the pharmacists made a safe and appropriate supply of two prescribed medicines to the simulated patient. Qualitative analysis identified seven core thinking processes used during the supply process: considering prescription in context, retrieving information, identifying medication-related issues, processing information, collaborative planning, decision making and reflection; and align closely with other health professionals. The insights from this study have implications for enhancing awareness of decision making processes in pharmacy practice and informing teaching and assessment approaches in medication supply.

Keywords: cognitive skills; medication supply; pharmacists; reasoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. The Pharmacy Guild of Australia . Dispensing Your Prescription Medicine: More than Sticking a Label on a Bottle. The Pharmacy Guild of Australia; Canberra, Australia: 2016.
    1. Croft H., Nesbitt K., Rasiah R., Levett-Jones T., Gilligan C. Safe dispensing in community pharmacies: How to apply the SHELL model for catching errors. Clin. Pharm. 2017;9:214–224.
    1. Philpott L. Robots give rise to the future of pharmacy dispensing. [(accessed on 9 June 2016)];Aust. J. Pharm. 2016 Available online: www.ajp.com.au.
    1. Lehnbom E., Oliver K., Baysain M., Westbrook J. Evidence Briefings on Interventions to Improve Medication Safety: Automated Dispensing Systems. Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research; Sydney, Australia: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; Sydney, Australia: 2013. [(accessed on 16 September 2017)]. Available online: www.safetyandquality.gov.au.
    1. Gregory P., Austin Z. How do community pharmacists make decisions? Results of an exploratory qualitative study in Ontario. Can. Pharm. J. 2016;149:90–98. doi: 10.1177/1715163515625656. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources