Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0682-5.

Which factor is the most effective one in metabolic Sydrome on the outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery? A cohort study of 5 Years

Affiliations

Which factor is the most effective one in metabolic Sydrome on the outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery? A cohort study of 5 Years

Lijuan Wang et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Metabolic Syndrome and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. However, the effects of Metabolic Syndrome with or without diabetes on perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft remain unclear.

Methods: An retrospective study was performed on 1166 patients who received isolated primary Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Fuwai hospital. They were divided into three groups: control, Metabolic Syndrome of three factors together with diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome of three factors without diabetes (n = 868, 76 and 222 respectively). Analysis of variance, Chi-rank test, Fisher's exact test, Log-rank test, Cox and Logistic regression models were used for data processing. Outcomes were postoperative and 5-year survival and morbidities.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups in in-hospital postoperative complications, epinephrine use, stroke, atrial fibrillation, renal failure, coma, myocardial infarction and repeated revascularization. Patients in the Metabolic Syndrome with diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome without diabetes and control groups, respectively, showed significant difference in perioperative Major Adverse Cerebral Cardiovascular Events (30.3% vs. 21.2%, 16.7%, P = 0.0071) and mortality (11.8% vs. 2.7%, 3.11%, P = 0.0003). The Metabolic Syndrome with diabetes group had higher rates of perioperative mortality than Metabolic Syndrome without diabetes (P = 0.0017, P of Fisher Test = 0.0039). Compared with non-diabetic patients with Metabolic Syndrome, those with Metabolic Syndrome and diabetes had increased long-term mortality (Adjusted HR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.4-13.3; P = 0.0113) and Major Adverse Cerebral Cardiovascular Events (Adjusted OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.0-2.8; P = 0.048). Control and non-diabetic Metabolic Syndrome groups did not differ in long-term mortality but controls had lower rates of Major Adverse Cerebral Cardiovascular Events (Adjusted OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.98; P = 0.0329).

Conclusions: There were significance differences between the three groups in perioperative Major Adverse Cerebral Cardiovascular Events and mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft. Compared with non-diabetic Metabolic Syndrome patients, patients with Metabolic Syndrome and diabetes had higher long-term Major Adverse Cerebral Cardiovascular Events and mortality. While patients free of MetS and diabetes were associated with lower incidence of long-term Major Adverse Cerebral Cardiovascular Events after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.

Keywords: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; Diabetes; Major adverse cerebral cardiovascular events; Metabolic syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accord with the Declaration of Helsinki principals and approved by the Fuwai Hospital Institutional Review Board. Informed consent (Consent to Participate) was obtained from each of the patients.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and available for review.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study population recruitment summary. This study enrolled from 4916 consecutive Chinese patients who underwent isolated primary CABG at Fuwai Hospital. Among them 1166 patients met the inclusion criteria of this research, who were divided into three groups: control (n = 868), MetS with diabetes (n = 76) and non-diabetes MetS (n = 222)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-meier for mortality rate following-up 5 years. MetS with diabetes group showed significant higher mortality than control group during the annual follow-up while Mets without diabetes group showed no significant difference. (Log-rank test P = 0.0075)

References

    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21(1):1–6. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000200416.65370.a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Echahidi N, Pibarot P, Despres JP, Daigle JM, et al. Metabolic syndrome increases operative mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(9):843–851. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moebus S, Balijepalli C, Lösch C, Göres L, et al. Age- and sex-specific prevalence and ten-year risk for cardiovascular disease of all 16 risk factor combinations of the metabolic syndrome - a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-34. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kajimoto K, Kasai T, Miyauchi K, Hirose H, et al. Metabolic syndrome predicts 10-year mortality in non-diabetic patients following coronary artery bypass surgery. Circ J. 2008;72(9):1481–1486. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-07-0928. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taggart DP. Impact of type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus on long-term outcomes after CABG. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(16):1653–1654. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.053. - DOI - PubMed