Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 7:3:161.
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.09.10. eCollection 2017.

Physiopathology aspects of anatomical video-assisted thoracic surgery resections: current status and prospects of development

Affiliations
Review

Physiopathology aspects of anatomical video-assisted thoracic surgery resections: current status and prospects of development

Majed Refai et al. J Vis Surg. .

Abstract

Pulmonary lobectomy remains the gold standard therapy for early-stage lung cancer. With the spread of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), surgeons began using this approach also to perform lobectomies, becoming progressively widespread worldwide. However some early-stage lung cancer patients are of questionable eligibility for open lobectomy being considered at high-risk to develop postoperative complications due to compromised pulmonary function or cardiopulmonary reserve. Herein we evaluate pathophysiology of VATS, focusing on: the correlation between the traditional predictors of outcome and overall complications, the current status of different VATS approaches and the role of VATS segmentectomy in high-risk patients, unable to tolerate lobectomy for their compromised cardiopulmonary reserve.

Keywords: Lung cancer; VATS pathophysiology; VATS segmentectomy; postoperative complications; video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Hazelrigg SR, Nunchuck SK, LoCicero J., 3rd Video assisted thoracic surgery study group data. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1039-43; discussion 1043-4. 10.1016/0003-4975(95)90011-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, et al. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:244-7. - PubMed
    1. Terra RM, Kazantzis T, Pinto-Filho DR, et al. Anatomic pulmonary resection by video-assisted thoracoscopy: the Brazilian experience (VATS Brazil study). J Bras Pneumol 2016;42:215-21 10.1590/S1806-37562015000000337 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not offer any functional recovery advantage in comparison to open approach 3 months after the operation: a case matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:1177-82. 10.1093/ejcts/ezx013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKenna RJ, Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:421-5; discussion 425-6. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.078 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources