Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Apr;209(4):418-23.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198904000-00005.

A multifactorial analysis of factors related to lethality after treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. 1935-1985

Affiliations

A multifactorial analysis of factors related to lethality after treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. 1935-1985

C Svanes et al. Ann Surg. 1989 Apr.

Abstract

One thousand one hundred and twenty-eight patients treated for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer during the years 1935-1985 were studied at the Haukeland University Hospital. The majority of patients (97.7%) were treated surgically. The data was analyzed by contingency tables and chi square testing, and a stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed in order to reveal interactions between variables and to elucidate time trends in lethality rates. The total postperforation lethality was 7.4%, the postsurgical death rate was 6.6%, and the death rate among conservatively treated patients was 42.3%. Lethality was significantly influenced by year of hospital admission and increased markedly with the age of the patients. For all age groups, the lethality decreased markedly with time. Treatment delay was associated with a moderate but significant increase in lethality. In patients with gastric ulcer the lethality was 3.6 times higher than in those with duodenal ulcer. The death rate was similar in the duodenal and pyloric ulcer groups. Death rate decreased with time in both stomach ulcer, duodenal, and pyloric ulcer patients. There was no sex difference and no difference between patients treated with simple suture or gastric resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Surg. 1933 Aug;98(2):197-209 - PubMed
    1. Acta Chir Scand. 1983;149(1):77-81 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1961 Aug;102:136-42 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1970 Sep;120(3):306-11 - PubMed
    1. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1983 Oct 10;103(28):1924-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources