Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 22;56(3):e01678-17.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01678-17. Print 2018 Mar.

Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group

Affiliations

Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group

Sukantha Chandrasekaran et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

The performance of a disk diffusion test using broth from positive blood cultures as inoculum (direct disk diffusion [dDD]) was evaluated for a collection of 20 challenge isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates seeded into human blood were inoculated into Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, VersaTREK Redox 1, and BacT/Alert FA Plus bottles and incubated in the respective automated blood culture systems. Disk diffusion results were compared to reference disk diffusion results. Categorical agreement (CA) values for dDD, after removal of random errors due to natural MIC variation, were 87.8%, 88.4%, and 92.2% for the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. No very major errors (VME) were observed, and major error (ME) rates were 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. Incubation of the dDD test samples for 6 h compared to incubation for 16 to 18 h resulted in 19.9% of tests having too light of growth to allow reading of zones of inhibition. Among the evaluable dDD tests, CA values were 58.9%, 76.6%, and 73.2% for the isolates seeded into the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. VME rates for isolates seeded into these systems were 2.2%, 1.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, and ME rates were 25.4%, 6.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, at the 6-h reading. The best performance of dDD was found for blood cultures with bacterial concentrations in the range of 7.6 × 107 to 5.0 × 108 CFU/ml; CA values ranged from 94.7 to 96.2% for these concentrations after 18 h of incubation and from 76.9 to 84.1% after 6 h of incubation. These preliminary data demonstrate the potential accuracy of dDD testing by the clinical laboratory.

Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; blood culture; susceptibility testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Bacterial concentrations (CFU per milliliter) at the time of positive signal for three blood culture systems. Counts were divided into 0.25-log increments; the number of CFU per milliliter that corresponds to each bin is listed in Table 6.

References

    1. Banerjee R, Teng CB, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, Steckelberg JM, Moriarty JP, Shah ND, Mandrekar JN, Patel R. 2015. Randomized trial of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based blood culture identification and susceptibility testing. Clin Infect Dis 61:1071–1080. doi:10.1093/cid/civ447. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerjee R, Teng CB, Cunningham SA, Ihde S, Steckelberg J, Moriarty JP, Shah ND, Mandrekar J, Patel R. 2016. Reply to Idelevich and Beck. Clin Infect Dis 62:269–270. doi:10.1093/cid/civ826. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mirrett S, Reller LB. 1979. Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood. J Clin Microbiol 10:482–487. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Idelevich EA, Schule I, Grunastel B, Wullenweber J, Peters G, Becker K. 2014. Acceleration of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by inoculation of Vitek 2 cards with briefly incubated solid medium cultures. J Clin Microbiol 52:4058–4062. doi:10.1128/JCM.02400-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Funke G, Funke-Kissling P. 2004. Use of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures in a three-phase trial. J Clin Microbiol 42:1466–1470. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.4.1466-1470.2004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms