Fifteen-Year Trends in Pediatric Liver Transplants: Split, Whole Deceased, and Living Donor Grafts
- PMID: 29307689
- PMCID: PMC5924625
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.015
Fifteen-Year Trends in Pediatric Liver Transplants: Split, Whole Deceased, and Living Donor Grafts
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate changes in patient and graft survival for pediatric liver transplant recipients since 2002, and to determine if these outcomes vary by graft type (whole liver transplant, split liver transplant [SLT], and living donor liver transplant [LDLT]).
Study design: We evaluated patient and graft survival among pediatric liver-only transplant recipients the PELD/MELD system was implemented using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.
Results: From 2002-2009 to 2010-2015, survival for SLT at 30 days improved (94% vs 98%; P < .001), and at 1 year improved for SLT (89% to 95%; P <.001) and LDLT (93% to 98%; P = .002). There was no change in survival for whole liver transplant at either 30 days (98% in both; P = .7) or 1 year (94% vs 95%; P = .2). The risk of early death with SLT was 2.14-fold higher in 2002-2009 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] vs whole liver transplant, 1.472.143.12), but this risk disappeared in 2010-2015 (aHR, 0.651.131.96), representing a significant improvement (P = .04). Risk of late death after SLT was similar in both time periods (aHR 2002-2009, 0.871.141.48; aHR 2010-2015, 0.560.881.37). LDLT had similar risk of early death (aHR 2002-2009, 0.491.032.14; aHR 2010-2015, 0.260.742.10) and late death (aHR 2002-2009, 0.520.831.32; aHR 2010-2015, 0.170.441.11). Graft loss was similar for SLT (aHR, 0.931.091.28) and was actually lower for LDLT (aHR, 0.530.710.95).
Conclusions: In recent years, outcomes after the use of technical variant grafts are comparable with whole grafts, and may be superior for LDLT. Greater use of technical variant grafts might provide an opportunity to increase organ supply without compromising post-transplant outcomes.
Keywords: allograft; liver; pediatric; split; transplant.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
To Split or Not to Split? That is No Longer the Question.J Pediatr. 2018 May;196:12-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Feb 1. J Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29395183 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Schladt DP, Edwards EB, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: liver. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2015 Jan;15(Suppl 2):1–28. - PubMed
-
- Perera MTPR, Mirza DF, Elias E. Liver transplantation: Issues for the next 20 years. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;24(Suppl 3):S124–131. - PubMed
-
- Buchanan P, Dzebisashvili N, Lentine KL, Axelrod DA, Schnitzler MA, Salvalaggio PR. Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission. Liver Transplant Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc. 2009 Oct;15:1270–7. - PubMed
-
- Mohammad S, Alonso EM. Approach to optimizing growth, rehabilitation, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children after solid-organ transplantation. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;57:539–557. table of contents. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
