Gene mutations in stool from gastric and colorectal neoplasia patients by next-generation sequencing
- PMID: 29307989
- PMCID: PMC5743500
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8291
Gene mutations in stool from gastric and colorectal neoplasia patients by next-generation sequencing
Abstract
Aim: To study cancer hotspot mutations by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in stool DNA from patients with different gastrointestinal tract (GIT) neoplasms.
Methods: Stool samples were collected from 87 Finnish patients diagnosed with various gastric and colorectal neoplasms, including benign tumors, and from 14 healthy controls. DNA was isolated from stools by using the PSP® Spin Stool DNA Plus Kit. For each sample, 20 ng of DNA was used to construct sequencing libraries using the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 or Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer panel v2. Sequencing was performed on Ion PGM. Torrent Suite Software v.5.2.2 was used for variant calling and data analysis.
Results: NGS was successful in assaying 72 GIT samples and 13 healthy controls, with success rates of the assay being 78% for stomach neoplasia and 87% for colorectal tumors. In stool specimens from patients with gastric neoplasia, five hotspot mutations were found in APC, CDKN2A and EGFR genes, in addition to seven novel mutations. From colorectal patients, 20 mutations were detected in AKT1, APC, ERBB2, FBXW7, KIT, KRAS, NRAS, SMARCB1, SMO, STK11 and TP53. Healthy controls did not exhibit any hotspot mutations, except for two novel ones. APC and TP53 were the most frequently mutated genes in colorectal neoplasms, with five mutations, followed by KRAS with two mutations. APC was the most commonly mutated gene in stools of patients with premalignant/benign GIT lesions.
Conclusion: Our results show that in addition to colorectal neoplasms, mutations can also be assayed from stool specimens of patients with gastric neoplasms.
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasia; Gastric neoplasia; Mutations; Next-generation sequencing; Stool DNA.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Driver Gene Mutations in Stools of Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Detected by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.J Mol Diagn. 2016 Jul;18(4):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 May 4. J Mol Diagn. 2016. PMID: 27155048
-
Fecal gene detection based on next generation sequencing for colorectal cancer diagnosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 7;28(25):2920-2936. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2920. World J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35978873 Free PMC article.
-
Spatio-temporal mutation profiles of case-matched colorectal carcinomas and their metastases reveal unique de novo mutations in metachronous lung metastases by targeted next generation sequencing.Mol Cancer. 2016 Oct 18;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0549-8. Mol Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27756406 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization of K-ras mutations identified in stool DNA for the early detection of colorectal cancer.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 2000;34:35-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(2000)77:34+<35::aid-jcb8>3.0.co;2-w. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 2000. PMID: 10762013 Review.
-
Role of Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for the Evaluation of Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors.Pathobiology. 2017;84(6):323-338. doi: 10.1159/000478662. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Pathobiology. 2017. PMID: 28817827 Review.
Cited by
-
Tissue gene mutation profiles in patients with colorectal cancer and their clinical implications.Biomed Rep. 2020 Jul;13(1):43-48. doi: 10.3892/br.2020.1303. Epub 2020 May 12. Biomed Rep. 2020. PMID: 32440349 Free PMC article.
-
Network approach in liquidomics landscape.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 4;42(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02743-9. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023. PMID: 37542343 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Potential prognostic and predictive value of UBE2N, IMPDH1, DYNC1LI1 and HRASLS2 in colorectal cancer stool specimens.Biomed Rep. 2023 Feb 7;18(3):22. doi: 10.3892/br.2023.1604. eCollection 2023 Mar. Biomed Rep. 2023. PMID: 36846616 Free PMC article.
-
A Simple and Highly Specific MassARRAY-Based Stool DNA Assay to Prioritize Follow-up Decisions in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Positive Individuals.Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 25;11(3):423. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030423. Cancers (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30934598 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Application of Different Liquid Biopsy Components in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):420. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040420. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38673047 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, Kalogeras KT, Kotoula V, Papamichael D, Laurent-Puig P, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:753–762. - PubMed
-
- Miranda C, Nucifora M, Molinari F, Conca E, Anania MC, Bordoni A, Saletti P, Mazzucchelli L, Pilotti S, Pierotti MA, et al. KRAS and BRAF mutations predict primary resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1769–1776. - PubMed
-
- Antonescu CR, Romeo S, Zhang L, Nafa K, Hornick JL, Nielsen GP, Mino-Kenudson M, Huang HY, Mosquera JM, Dei Tos PA, et al. Dedifferentiation in gastrointestinal stromal tumor to an anaplastic KIT-negative phenotype: a diagnostic pitfall: morphologic and molecular characterization of 8 cases occurring either de novo or after imatinib therapy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:385–392. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Joensuu H, Rutkowski P, Nishida T, Steigen SE, Brabec P, Plank L, Nilsson B, Braconi C, Bordoni A, Magnusson MK, et al. KIT and PDGFRA mutations and the risk of GI stromal tumor recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:634–642. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous