Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 1;6(3):1668-1675.
doi: 10.1039/c4sc03736g. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

Mesoporous inorganic salts with crystal defects: unusual catalysts and catalyst supports

Affiliations

Mesoporous inorganic salts with crystal defects: unusual catalysts and catalyst supports

Xinchen Kang et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

We proposed a strategy to synthesize mesoporous inorganic salt particles using the special properties of ionic liquid (IL) mixtures, and hollow mesoporous LaF3, NdF3, and YF3 particles were synthesized and characterized using different techniques. The size of the mesopores in the salt particles was about 4 nm, and the materials were full of crystal defects. The LaF3, NdF3 and YF3 particles were used as the catalysts for the cyanosilylation reaction of benzaldehyde using trimethylsilyl cyanide, and Ru/LaF3 and Ru/NdF3, in which Ru nanocatalysts were supported on the LaF3 and NdF3 particles with mesopores, were used to catalyze hydrogenations of benzene to cyclohexane and levulinic acid (LA) to γ-valerolactone (GVL). It was discovered that the activities of these catalysts were unprecedentedly high for these reactions. Detailed study showed that both the crystal defects and the mesopores in the salt particles played crucial roles for the extremely high catalytic activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of LaF3: (a) LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.5; (b) LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.33; (c) commercial LaF3; and (d) standard pattern.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. SEM and TEM images of mesoporous LaF3 synthesized in the OmimCl–N(Bu)4PF6 mixtures: (a) SEM image of the LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.5; (b) TEM image of the LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.5; (c) SEM image of the LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.33; (d) TEM image of the LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.33; (e) HRTEM image to show the pores on the walls of the LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.5; and (f) HRTEM image to show the crystal structure and the SAED pattern (the inset pattern) of the LaF3 synthesized at x 2 = 0.5.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (the insets) of the LaF3 particles synthesized at x 2 = 0.5 (a) and 0.33 (b).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Mass fractal dimension (D m) from SAXS curves of the as-prepared LaF3 materials synthesized at x 2 = 0.5 (a), 0.33 (b).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. SAXS curves (a) and normalized pair-distance distribution function curves (b) of the OmimCl–N(Bu)4PF6 mixtures at x 2 = 0.5 (A) and 0.33 (B).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. The schematic diagram for the formation mechanism of mesoporous LaF3 particles with a hollow core.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. XRD patterns of the as-synthesized fluoride salts (A) synthesized at x 2 = 0.5 and the corresponding standard patterns (B): (a) NdF3; and (b) YF3.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. SEM and TEM images of NdF3 (a and b) and YF3 (c and d) materials synthesized at x 2 = 0.5.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. The reaction mechanism for cyanosilylation of benzaldehyde to cyanohydrin.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. The reaction mechanism for benzene hydrogenation to cyclohexane.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. The reusability of the Ru/LaF3 catalyst for benzene hydrogenation to cyclohexane at 50 °C, 0.22 h (a) and 25 °C, 0.5 h (b). The other conditions were the same as in Table 1.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3. The reaction mechanism for LA hydrogenation to GVL.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qie L., Chen W. M., Wang Z. H., Shao Q. G., Li X., Yuan L. X., Hu X. L., Zhang W. X., Huang Y. H. Adv. Mater. 2012;24:2047. - PubMed
    2. Liang J., Zhou R. F., Chen X. M., Tang Y. H., Qiao S. Z. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:6074. - PubMed
    1. Lu W. G., Yuan D. Q., Sculley J., Zhao D., Krishna R., Zhou H. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:18126. - PubMed
    2. Johnson D. W., Sherborne C., Didsbury M. P., Pateman C., Cameron N. R., Claeyssens F. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:3178. - PubMed
    1. Wang Z. P., Yu J. H., Xu R. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1729. - PubMed
    2. Zhang L. L., Hu Z. Q., Jiang J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:3722. - PubMed
    3. Wen Q., Di J. C., Jiang L., Yu J. H., Xu R. R. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:591.
    1. Cook T. R., Zheng Y. R., Stang P. J. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:734. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Cao S., Gody G., Zhao W., Perrier S., Peng X. Y., Ducati C., Zhao D. Y., Cheetham A. K. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:3573.
    3. Li M., Li D., O'Keeffe M., Yaghi O. M. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:1343. - PubMed
    1. Tozawa T., Jones J. T. A., Swamy S. I., Jiang S., Adams D. J., Shakespeare S., Clowes R., Bradshaw D., Hasell T., Chong S. Y., Tang C., Thompson S., Parker J., Trewin A., Bacsa J., Slawin A. M. Z., Steiner A., Cooper A. I. Nat. Mater. 2009;8:973. - PubMed
    2. Colson J. W., Woll A. R., Mukherjee A., Levendorf M. P., Spitler E. L., Shields V. B., Spencer M. G., Park J., Dichtel W. R. Science. 2011;332:228. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources