Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):260-263.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000533.

American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference Summary Report

Affiliations

American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference Summary Report

Nazema Y Siddiqui et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul/Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The 2016 American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference brought together thought leaders in the field of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The goal was to identify critical areas of need for future research. This article summarizes the findings.

Methods: Prior to the conference, 5 major focus areas were identified. Focus areas were explored over the 2-day conference. Clinicians, clinical and basic science researchers, and representatives from government agencies, industry, patient advocacy groups, and the public convened to identify the major gaps in knowledge in each of these focus areas.

Results: The 5 major topics were as follows: (1) mechanistic research on pelvic supportive structures and how these are altered with pregnancy, delivery, and aging; (2) novel prostheses or implants that address pathophysiology and provide mechanical support; (3) large-scale community-based research; (4) clinical trials to optimize outcomes after POP surgery; and (5) evidence-based quality measures for POP outcomes. Key recommendations were made for each topic.

Conclusions: Critical gaps in our knowledge were identified. These limit scientific discovery across all 5 topic areas. Further scientific progress would be advanced by (1) developing a standardized group of POP outcomes and quality measures for large trials and community-based research, (2) creating specimen biorepositories that are integrated with robust clinical data, and (3) developing collaborative teams with expertise from a variety of disciplines, convened to tackle our most challenging and complex scientific questions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jones J and Hunter D, Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 1995. 311(7001): p. 376–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nygaard I, et al., Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA, 2013. 309(19): p. 2016–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. FDA, Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse 2011.
    1. FDA, Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Reclassification of Surgical Mesh for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair. 01/May/2016: p. 353–361. - PubMed
    1. Clemons JL, et al., Impact of the 2011 FDA transvaginal mesh safety update on AUGS members’ use of synthetic mesh and biologic grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2013. 19(4): p. 191–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms