Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jan;20(1):159-167.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13154. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

Comparative effects of valsartan plus either cilnidipine or hydrochlorothiazide on home morning blood pressure surge evaluated by information and communication technology-based nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative effects of valsartan plus either cilnidipine or hydrochlorothiazide on home morning blood pressure surge evaluated by information and communication technology-based nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring

Takeshi Fujiwara et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jan.

Abstract

The authors tested the hypothesis that a valsartan/cilnidipine combination would suppress the home morning blood pressure (BP) surge (HMBPS) more effectively than a valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in patients with morning hypertension, defined as systolic BP (SBP) ≥135 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥85 mm Hg assessed by a self-measuring information and communication technology-based home BP monitoring device more than three times before either combination's administration. This was an 8-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. The HMBPS, which is a new index, was defined as the mean morning SBP minus the mean nocturnal SBP, both measured on the same day. The authors randomly allocated 129 patients to the valsartan/cilnidipine (63 patients; mean 68.4 years) or valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (66 patients; mean 67.3 years) combination groups, and the baseline HMBPS values were 17.4 mm Hg vs 16.9 mm Hg, respectively (P = .820). At the end of the treatment period, the changes in nocturnal SBP and morning SBP from baseline were significant in both the valsartan/cilnidipine and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide groups (P < .001): -5.0 vs -10.0 mm Hg (P = .035) and -10.7 vs -13.6 mm Hg (P = .142), respectively. HMBPS was significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (P < .001), but there was no significant difference between the two groups: 14.4 mm Hg vs 14.0 mm Hg, respectively (P = .892). Valsartan/cilnidipine could not significantly suppress HMBPS compared with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. Large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to assess how reducing HMBPS will affect future cardiovascular outcomes. The information and communication technology-based home BP monitoring device may become an alternative to ambulatory BP monitoring, which has been a gold standard to measure nocturnal BP and the morning BP surge.

Keywords: automatic information and communication technology-based home blood pressure monitoring device; home morning blood pressure surge; morning blood pressure; nocturnal blood pressure; valsartan/cilnidipine combination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. BP indicates blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HCTZ, hydrochlorothiazide; SBP, systolic blood pressure
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient disposition. HCTZ indicates hydrochlorothiazide
Figure 3
Figure 3
The comparison of morning systolic blood pressure (SBP) surge at the end of the treatment period between the valsartan/cilnidipine combination and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The P value refers to the comparison of home morning blood pressure (BP) surge between the valsartan/cilnidipine combination and the valsartan/HCTZ combination

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population‐based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens. 1998;16:971‐975. - PubMed
    1. Sega R, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow‐up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. Circulation. 2005;111:1777‐1783. - PubMed
    1. Stergiou GS, Baibas NM, Kalogeropoulos PG. Cardiovascular risk prediction based on home blood pressure measurement: the Didima study. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1590‐1596. - PubMed
    1. Niiranen TJ, Hanninen MR, Johansson J, Reunanen A, Jula AM. Home‐measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn‐Home study. Hypertension. 2010;55:1346‐1351. - PubMed
    1. Gosse P, Ansoborio P, Lemetayer P, Clementy J. Left ventricular mass is better correlated with arising blood pressure than with office or occasional blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:505‐510. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources