Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Oct;70(10):1431-1438.
doi: 10.1002/acr.23512.

Medical Care Costs Associated With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the US: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Medical Care Costs Associated With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the US: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Andrew Hresko et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a morbid, mortal, and costly condition without a cure. Treatments for RA have expanded over the last 2 decades, and direct medical costs may differ by types of treatments. There has not been a systematic literature review since the introduction of new RA treatments, including biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review with meta-analysis of direct medical costs associated with RA patients cared for in the US since the marketing of the first bDMARD. Standard search strategies and sources were used, and data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers. The methods and quality of included studies were assessed. Total direct medical costs as well as RA-specific costs were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroups of interest included Medicare patients and those using bDMARDs.

Results: We found 541 potentially relevant studies, and 12 articles met the selection criteria. The quality of studies varied: one-third were poor, one-third were fair, and one-third were good. Total direct medical costs were estimated at $12,509 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 7,451-21,001) for all RA patients using any treatment regimen and $36,053 (95% CI 32,138-40,445) for bDMARD users. RA-specific costs were $3,723 (95% CI 2,408-5,762) for all RA patients using any treatment regimen and $20,262 (95% CI 17,480-23,487) for bDMARD users.

Conclusion: The total and disease-specific direct medical costs for patients with RA is substantial. Among bDMARD users, the cost of RA care is more than half of all direct medical costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts: Dr. Solomon receives research support from grants to his hospital from Amgen, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Corrona. Dr. Lin is now an employee of Amgen but not at the time of writing this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
shows the assembly of literature for the systematic literature review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
shows the meta-analysis results for the direct medical costs. Panel A demonstrates the total cost of care for all patients. Panel B demonstrates the total cost of care for biologic DMARD users only. Panel C demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for all patients. Panel D demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for biologic DMARD users only. Multiple papers included in these meta-analyses reported cost of care findings for several distinct patient populations. These distinct populations are each treated as individual contributors to the meta-analysis and are listed with the identifying characteristic of the patient population studied (e.g. individual year or specific drug treatment regimen).
Figure 2
Figure 2
shows the meta-analysis results for the direct medical costs. Panel A demonstrates the total cost of care for all patients. Panel B demonstrates the total cost of care for biologic DMARD users only. Panel C demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for all patients. Panel D demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for biologic DMARD users only. Multiple papers included in these meta-analyses reported cost of care findings for several distinct patient populations. These distinct populations are each treated as individual contributors to the meta-analysis and are listed with the identifying characteristic of the patient population studied (e.g. individual year or specific drug treatment regimen).
Figure 2
Figure 2
shows the meta-analysis results for the direct medical costs. Panel A demonstrates the total cost of care for all patients. Panel B demonstrates the total cost of care for biologic DMARD users only. Panel C demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for all patients. Panel D demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for biologic DMARD users only. Multiple papers included in these meta-analyses reported cost of care findings for several distinct patient populations. These distinct populations are each treated as individual contributors to the meta-analysis and are listed with the identifying characteristic of the patient population studied (e.g. individual year or specific drug treatment regimen).
Figure 2
Figure 2
shows the meta-analysis results for the direct medical costs. Panel A demonstrates the total cost of care for all patients. Panel B demonstrates the total cost of care for biologic DMARD users only. Panel C demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for all patients. Panel D demonstrates rheumatoid arthritis-specific costs of care for biologic DMARD users only. Multiple papers included in these meta-analyses reported cost of care findings for several distinct patient populations. These distinct populations are each treated as individual contributors to the meta-analysis and are listed with the identifying characteristic of the patient population studied (e.g. individual year or specific drug treatment regimen).

References

    1. Sacks JJ, Luo YH, Helmick CG. Prevalence of specific types of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the ambulatory health care system in the United States, 2001–2005. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:460–464. - PubMed
    1. Cooper NJ. Economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2000;39:28–33. - PubMed
    1. Lubeck DP. A review of the direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19:811–18. - PubMed
    1. Rat CA, Boisser MC. Rheumatoid arthritis: direct and indirect costs. Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71:518–24. - PubMed
    1. Fautrel B, Verstappen SM, Boonen A. Economic consequences and potential benefits. Best Pract Clin Rheumatol. 2011;25:607–24. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources