Estimating the returns to United Kingdom publicly funded musculoskeletal disease research in terms of net value of improved health outcomes
- PMID: 29316935
- PMCID: PMC5761203
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0276-7
Estimating the returns to United Kingdom publicly funded musculoskeletal disease research in terms of net value of improved health outcomes
Abstract
Background: Building on an approach applied to cardiovascular and cancer research, we estimated the economic returns from United Kingdom public- and charitable-funded musculoskeletal disease (MSD) research that arise from the net value of the improved health outcomes in the United Kingdom.
Methods: To calculate the economic returns from MSD-related research in the United Kingdom, we estimated (1) the public and charitable expenditure on MSD-related research in the United Kingdom between 1970 and 2013; (2) the net monetary benefit (NMB), derived from the health benefit in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) valued in monetary terms (using a base-case value of a QALY of £25,000) minus the cost of delivering that benefit, for a prioritised list of interventions from 1994 to 2013; (3) the proportion of NMB attributable to United Kingdom research; and (4) the elapsed time between research funding and health gain. The data collected from these four key elements were used to estimate the internal rate of return (IRR) from MSD-related research investments on health benefits. We analysed the uncertainties in the IRR estimate using a one-way sensitivity analysis.
Results: Expressed in 2013 prices, total expenditure on MSD-related research from 1970 to 2013 was £3.5 billion, and for the period used to estimate the rate of return, 1978-1997, was £1.4 billion. Over the period 1994-2013 the key interventions analysed produced 871,000 QALYs with a NMB of £16 billion, allowing for the net NHS costs resulting from them and valuing a QALY at £25,000. The proportion of benefit attributable to United Kingdom research was 30% and the elapsed time between funding and impact of MSD treatments was 16 years. Our best estimate of the IRR from MSD-related research was 7%, which is similar to the 9% for CVD and 10% for cancer research.
Conclusions: Our estimate of the IRR from the net health gain to public and charitable funding of MSD-related research in the United Kingdom is substantial, and justifies the research investments made between 1978 and 1997. We also demonstrated the applicability of the approach previously used in assessing the returns from cardiovascular and cancer research. Inevitably, with a study of this kind, there are a number of important assumptions and caveats that we highlight, and these can inform future research.
Keywords: Elapsed time; Medical research charities; Medical research investment; Musculoskeletal disease; QALYs; Rate of return; Research payback; Value of health.
Conflict of interest statement
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes.BMC Med. 2014 Jun 16;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-99. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 24930803 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom.BMC Med. 2016 Feb 24;14:32. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0564-z. BMC Med. 2016. PMID: 26908129 Free PMC article.
-
A macroeconomic assessment of the impact of medical research expenditure: A case study of NIHR Biomedical Research Centres.PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0214361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214361. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30970015 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of interventions to return employees to work following long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders.J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):115-24. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr057. Epub 2011 Aug 16. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012. PMID: 21846930 Review.
-
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015. Tob Use Insights. 2015. PMID: 26242225 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
An assessment of the performance of the national health research system in Mauritius.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 6;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09208-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36879247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can the sustainable development goal 9 support an untreated early childhood caries elimination agenda?BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 11;24(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04552-8. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38992678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are UK and Ireland trauma and orthopaedic surgeons maintaining their research output?Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Oct;102(8):625-631. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0159. Epub 2020 Aug 11. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020. PMID: 32777931 Free PMC article.
-
Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research.Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;55(12):647-648. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103146. Epub 2020 Dec 24. Br J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 33361277 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Is there a sufficient supply of clinical academics for UK medical schools? A retrospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e086211. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086211. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39306352 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Røttingen J-A, Regmi S, Eide M, Young AJ, Viergever RF, Ardal C, Guzman J, Edwards D, Matlin SA, Terry RF. Mapping of available health research and development data: what’s there, what’s missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? Lancet. 2013;382:1286–307. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61046-6. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Health Economics Research Group, Office of Health Economics, RAND Europe . Medical Research: What’s it Worth? Estimating the Economic Benefits from Medical Research in the UK. London: UK Evaluation Forum; 2008.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases