Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jan 9;319(2):143-153.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20040.

Association Between Handover of Anesthesia Care and Adverse Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Association Between Handover of Anesthesia Care and Adverse Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

Philip M Jones et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Handing over the care of a patient from one anesthesiologist to another occurs during some surgeries and might increase the risk of adverse outcomes.

Objective: To assess whether complete handover of intraoperative anesthesia care is associated with higher likelihood of mortality or major complications compared with no handover of care.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective population-based cohort study (April 1, 2009-March 31, 2015 set in the Canadian province of Ontario) of adult patients aged 18 years and older undergoing major surgeries expected to last at least 2 hours and requiring a hospital stay of at least 1 night.

Exposure: Complete intraoperative handover of anesthesia care from one physician anesthesiologist to another compared with no handover of anesthesia care.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, hospital readmission, or major postoperative complications, all within 30 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome. Inverse probability of exposure weighting based on the propensity score was used to estimate adjusted exposure effects.

Results: Of the 313 066 patients in the cohort, 56% were women; the mean (SD) age was 60 (16) years; 49% of surgeries were performed in academic centers; 72% of surgeries were elective; and the median duration of surgery was 182 minutes (interquartile [IQR] range, 124-255). A total of 5941 (1.9%) patients underwent surgery with complete handover of anesthesia care. The percentage of patients undergoing surgery with a handover of anesthesiology care progressively increased each year of the study, reaching 2.9% in 2015. In the unweighted sample, the primary outcome occurred in 44% of the complete handover group compared with 29% of the no handover group. After adjustment, complete handovers were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted risk difference [aRD], 6.8% [95% CI, 4.5% to 9.1%]; P < .001), all-cause death (aRD, 1.2% [95% CI, 0.5% to 2%]; P = .002), and major complications (aRD, 5.8% [95% CI, 3.6% to 7.9%]; P < .001), but not with hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery (aRD, 1.2% [95% CI, -0.3% to 2.7%]; P = .11).

Conclusions and relevance: Among adults undergoing major surgery, complete handover of intraoperative anesthesia care compared with no handover was associated with a higher risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. These findings may support limiting complete anesthesia handovers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cohort Build and Missing Data for Surgeries With Complete Handover vs No Handover
aBilling code for replacement anesthesiologist not used as intended (1 institution) refers to 1 Ontario institution which systematically billed the code used to define the main exposure in this study for an alternative purpose (ie, the postoperative care of patients with complicated medical needs in the postanesthetic care unit). Since it was not possible to positively determine which exposures among these patients were intraoperative vs postoperative, all patients who underwent surgery at this institution were excluded. bTo move from the complete case cohort (256 424 patients) to the subgroup analysis cohort (308 014 patients), 51 670 patients missing data on years since graduation for the primary anesthesiologist were added to the complete case cohort, and 80 patients were subtracted who also had missing data on duration of surgery.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Risk of Adverse Outcomes (Complete Intraoperative Handover of Anesthesia Care vs no Handover Groups) in the Prespecified Subgroups
See Statistical Analysis for calculation methods of subgroup effects. Because of missing data, years since graduation for the primary anesthesiologist was excluded as a covariate in these analyses (Figure 1). aData were plotted in the year the fiscal year ended (end date, March 31). bSmall cell sizes (≤5) cannot be reported and were obscured to create ambiguity.

Comment in

References

    1. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. ; STROBE Initiative . Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al. ; RECORD Working Committee . The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001885-e22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irony TZ. The “utility” in composite outcome measures: measuring what is important to patients. JAMA. 2017;318(18):1820-1821. - PubMed
    1. Austin PC. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Stat Med. 2010;29(20):2137-2148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. The propensity score. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1637-1638. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding