Multidetector CT of Midfacial Fractures: Classification Systems, Principles of Reduction, and Common Complications
- PMID: 29320322
- DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170074
Multidetector CT of Midfacial Fractures: Classification Systems, Principles of Reduction, and Common Complications
Abstract
The advent of titanium hardware, which provides firm three-dimensional positional control, and the exquisite bone detail afforded by multidetector computed tomography (CT) have spurred the evolution of subunit-specific midfacial fracture management principles. The structural, diagnostic, and therapeutic complexity of the individual midfacial subunits, including the nose, the naso-orbito-ethmoidal region, the internal orbits, the zygomaticomaxillary complex, and the maxillary occlusion-bearing segment, are not adequately reflected in the Le Fort classification system, which provides only a general framework and has become less relevant in contemporary practice. The purpose of this article is to facilitate the involvement of radiologists in the delivery of individualized multidisciplinary care to adults who have sustained blunt trauma and have midfacial fractures by providing a clinically relevant review of the role of multidetector CT in the management of each midfacial subunit. Surgically relevant anatomic structures, search patterns, critical CT findings and their management implications, contemporary classification systems, and common posttraumatic and postoperative complications are emphasized. ©RSNA, 2018.
Similar articles
-
Comparing diagnosis of midfacial fractures by radiologists and plastic surgeons.Emerg Radiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):499-505. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02036-2. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Emerg Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35266070
-
Responsible and prudent imaging in the diagnosis and management of facial fractures.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Nov;25(4):545-60. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.07.001. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 24183372 Review.
-
Do Radiologists and Surgeons Speak the Same Language? A Retrospective Review of Facial Trauma.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov;207(5):1070-1076. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15901. Epub 2016 Aug 24. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016. PMID: 27556232
-
A comprehensive classification of craniofacial fractures: postmortem and clinical studies with two- and three-dimensional computed tomography.Injury. 2002 Oct;33(8):651-68. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00119-5. Injury. 2002. PMID: 12213415
-
Postoperative CT of the Midfacial Skeleton After Trauma: Review of Normal Appearances and Common Complications.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct;209(4):W238-W248. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17875. Epub 2017 Jul 13. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28705063 Review.
Cited by
-
Facial fractures: classification and highlights for a useful report.Insights Imaging. 2020 Mar 19;11(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00847-w. Insights Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32193796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New and emerging patient-centered CT imaging and image-guided treatment paradigms for maxillofacial trauma.Emerg Radiol. 2018 Oct;25(5):533-545. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1616-9. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Emerg Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29922866 Review.
-
Incidence, Aetiology, and Associated Fracture Patterns of Infraorbital Nerve Injuries Following Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of 272 Patients.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022 Jun;15(2):139-146. doi: 10.1177/19433875211022569. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022. PMID: 35633769 Free PMC article.
-
[Trauma of the midface : Symptoms, diagnostics and treatment].HNO. 2024 Sep;72(9):676-684. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01492-1. Epub 2024 Jun 24. HNO. 2024. PMID: 38913183 Review. German.
-
Facial trauma education in radiology: using surgeon feedback as the benchmark for success.Emerg Radiol. 2024 Dec;31(6):807-814. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02288-0. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Emerg Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39412593 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical