Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190247.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190247. eCollection 2018.

The impact of electronic consultation on a Canadian tertiary care pediatric specialty referral system: A prospective single-center observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

The impact of electronic consultation on a Canadian tertiary care pediatric specialty referral system: A prospective single-center observational study

Lillian Lai et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) is a web-based asynchronous electronic communication service that allows primary-care- practitioners (PCPs) to submit "elective" clinical questions to a specialist. For adults, PCPs have reported improved access and timeliness to specialist advice, averted face-to-face specialist referrals in up to 40% of cases and high provider satisfaction.

Objective: To determine whether the expansion of eConsult to a pediatric setting would result in similar measures of improved healthcare system process and high provider acceptance reported in adults.

Design: Prospective observational cohort study.

Setting: Single Canadian tertiary-care academic pediatric hospital (June 2014-16) servicing 1.2 million people.

Participants: 1. PCPs already using eConsult. 2.Volunteer pediatric specialists provided services in addition to their regular workload. 3.Pediatric patients (< 18 years-old) referred for none-acute care conditions.

Main outcomes and measures: Specialty service utilization and access, impact on PCP course-of-action and referral-patterns and survey-based provider satisfaction data were collected.

Results: 1064 eConsult requests from 367 PCPs were answered by 23 pediatric specialists representing 14 specialty-services. The top three specialties represented were: General Pediatrics 393 cases (36.9%), Orthopedics 162 (15.2%) and Psychiatry 123 (11.6%). Median specialist response time was 0.9 days (range <1 hour-27 days), most consults (63.2%) required <10minutes to complete and 21/21(100%) specialist survey-respondents reported minimal workload burden. For 515/1064(48.4%) referrals, PCPs received advice for a new or additional course of action; 391/1064(36.7%) referrals resulted in an averted face-to-face specialist visit. In 9 specialties with complete data, the median wait-time was significantly less (p<0.001) for an eConsult (1 day, 95%CI:0.9-1.2) compared with a face-to-face referral (132 days; 95%CI:127-136). The majority (>93.3%) of PCPs rated eConsult as very good/excellent value for both patients and themselves. All specialist survey-respondents indicated eConsult should be a continued service.

Conclusions and relevance: Similar to adults, eConsult improves PCP access and timeliness to elective pediatric specialist advice and influences their care decisions, while reporting high end-user satisfaction. Further study is warranted to assess impact on resource utilization and clinical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Drs. Leigh Fraser Roberts, Kathy Keely and Judy Van Stralen were paid directly for their services by eConsult during the study period. The rest of the authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. The authors have no other conflicts of interest related to activities, relationships and affiliations to disclose involving the work under consideration for publication. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Impact on course of action by the primary care practitioner, by specialty service with > 10 cases.
Impact of specialist response on PCP course of action: (Blue) Provided new information and/or additional course of action; (Red) Confirmed course of action; (Green) Considered not useful and (Purple) Other.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Impact on need for referral as indicated by primary care practitioner, by specialty service with > 10 cases.
Impact of specialist response on PCP perceived need for patient referral: (Light Blue) Referral avoided; (Orange) Referral still not needed; (Gray) Referral still needed; (Yellow) New referral needed; (Dark Blue) No benefit and (Green) Other.

References

    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(12):2805–16. - PubMed
    1. Association CM. Experiences with Referral from Primary to Specialty Care. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Medical Association; 2012.
    1. Wright JG, Menaker RJ, the Canadian Paediatric Surgical Wait Times Study Group. Waiting for children’s surgery in Canada: the Canadian Paediatric Surgical Wait Times project. CMAJ. 2011; 183(9): e559–64. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101530 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams L, O'Riordan S, McGuigan C, Hutchinson M, Tubridy N. A web-based electronic neurology referral system: a solution for an overburdened healthcare system? Ir Med J. 2012;105(9):301–3. - PubMed
    1. Whited JD, Warshaw EM, Edison KE, Kapur K, Thottapurathu L, Raju S, et al. Effect of store and forward teledermatology on quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(5):584–91. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamadermatol.380 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types