Data sharing in clinical trials - practical guidance on anonymising trial datasets
- PMID: 29321053
- PMCID: PMC5763739
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2382-9
Data sharing in clinical trials - practical guidance on anonymising trial datasets
Abstract
Background: There is an increasing demand by non-commercial funders that trialists should provide access to trial data once the primary analysis is completed. This has to take into account concerns about identifying individual trial participants, and the legal and regulatory requirements.
Methods: Using the good practice guideline laid out by the work funded by the Medical Research Council Hubs for Trials Methodology Research (MRC HTMR), we anonymised a dataset from a recently completed trial. Using this example, we present practical guidance on how to anonymise a dataset, and describe rules that could be used on other trial datasets. We describe how these might differ if the trial was to be made freely available to all, or if the data could only be accessed with specific permission and data usage agreements in place.
Results: Following the good practice guidelines, we successfully created a controlled access model for trial data sharing. The data were assessed on a case-by-case basis classifying variables as direct, indirect and superfluous identifiers with differing methods of anonymisation assigned depending on the type of identifier. A final dataset was created and checks of the anonymised dataset were applied. Lastly, a procedure for release of the data was implemented to complete the process.
Conclusions: We have implemented a practical solution to the data anonymisation process resulting in a bespoke anonymised dataset for a recently completed trial. We have gained useful learnings in terms of efficiency of the process going forward, the need to balance anonymity with data utilisation and future work that should be undertaken.
Keywords: Anonymisation; Clinical trial; Controlled access; Data sharing; Direct identifier.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
TOPPIC received ethical approval from Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (ref. 07/MRE00/74) and informed written consent recorded for all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
-
- British Medical Journal Editorial: Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. BMJ 2017;357:j2372. 10.1136/bmj.j2372.
-
- Data Protection Act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
-
- Understanding Patient Data. https://understandingpatientdata.org.uk/. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
-
- Medical Research Council. Good practice principles for sharing individual participant data from publicly funded clinical trials. Version 1 April 2015. https://www.methodologyhubs.mrc.ac.uk/files/7114/3682/3831/Datasharinggu.... Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical